SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/17/2002 3:17:32 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
<<Bible: "woe to those who turn back on Israel">>

I don't think what The U.S. has done could be called 'turning our back on Israel'...The question is are we viewed as a credible peace broker who is 'even-handed' with our policies in The Middle East...? Is it appropriate for us to allow Sharon and his IDF forces to ignore our President for over 2 weeks and antagonize the entire region...? I want peace for both the Palestinians and the Israelis...I'm also a Christian and am well aware of what's in the bible...Yet, last weekend the head minister in our church spoke out about violence in The Middle East and called on The U.S. to do much more to difuse the conflict. It's clear that the latest Israeli occupation is an impediment to peace and I would contend that Sharon's militaristic response will have many unintended consequences...We already see some of them on the streets of all the major cities in the Arab world. Here's a recent column by William Buckley that I completely agree with (and that's rare <g>)....

SHARON'S CONTRIBUTION
Sat Apr 13, 9:01 PM ET
By William F. Buckley Jr.
story.news.yahoo.com

My vote is that Ariel Sharon (news - web sites)'s offensive is the stupidest campaign in recent memory. Defined here as a campaign that has solved nothing, increased Israel's problems, intensified Palestinian hatred of Israel, estranged many Europeans and Americans, and fanned Islamic hostility. What is General Sharon up to?


What he said was that he was determined to destroy the "infrastructure" of the suicide terrorists.

Well, how do you do that?

We Americans are trying to do that to al-Qaida. This involved a war on the government of Afghanistan (news - web sites), a nation formally identified with terrorists it sheltered, trained and dispatched to do their grisly work. The United States, in effect, declared war on the Taliban government and pursued that war as best it could. Having toppled Kabul, our anti-terrorist forces are now deployed here and there, doing such things as raiding a terrorist nest in Pakistan and hauling in a suspect leader.

Sharon's policy is scorched-earth. Under his command, the Israeli army has engaged not in isolating the infrastructure of the suicide terrorists. What he is engaged in is wanton damage. The New York Times' Serge Schmemann, reporting from Jerusalem, tells it in a dispatch on Thursday with a memorable lead:

"The images are indelible: piles of concrete and twisted metal in the ancient casbah of Nablus, husks of savaged computers littering ministries in Ramallah, rows of storefronts sheared by passing tanks in Tulkarm, broken pipes gushing precious water, flattened cars in fields of shattered glass and garbage, electricity poles snapped like twigs, tilting walls where homes used to stand, gaping holes where rockets pierced office buildings." And he uses Sharon's missionary mandate without apparent irony: "It is safe to say that the infrastructure of life itself and of any future Palestinian state -- roads, schools, electricity pylons, water pipes, telephone lines -- has been devastated."

How's that for retaliation for the Passover massacre?

What Sharon has been doing is to give way to Israeli rage. The rage is hot, deserved and purposive. But to proceed on the assumption that water and electricity lines and schools and hospitals are vital organs of terrorist excursions is untenable except on an understanding that General Sharon hasn't articulated. If you say: The poison that animates the suicide bombers is endemic in every stick and stone that make up the West Bank, then it would follow that a destruction of everything and of everybody standing would follow, as an inoculation would serve to chase down the infection in any part of the diseased body. Sharon hasn't ordered his soldiers to mow down every Palestinian standing, but his artillery and air force haven't been discriminating.

There is no way to be entirely discriminating in a military offensive designed to find something that can't be found, namely the fuse box that causes an 18-year-old Palestinian girl to arm herself with a bomb and detonate it in an Israeli mall. There aren't, sitting about, neat paramilitary kiosks with explosives and rosters of willing terrorists. The search for these was bound to be fruitless, rather like looking for the infrastructure of lechery in Gomorrah.

General Sharon might have sent in a platoon, pulled out Arafat and his 100 lieutenants and executed them on the entirely reasonable grounds that they embodied the terrorist movement in the West Bank. A bullet into the heart of Arafat is not a wayward contribution to the search for the infrastructure of the evil and genocidal war against Israel. So Palestine would be left leaderless? Such a problem would be that of the Palestinians who have tolerated Arafat for so many years.

What has been done is to enhance and even legitimize Palestinian grievances. "After four days of heavy fighting," the Times dispatch goes on, "the Casbah, as the centuries-old warren of shops and homes at the center of this city (Nablus) is known, has been utterly destroyed."

How would we feel in analogous circumstances? What happened to Atlanta in 1864 at the hands of Gen. Sherman was perceived through the lens of a great civil war, a surrender of the losing side, and the heart and mind of a magnanimous national leader who sought to heal the wounds of a nation torn asunder. Such elements aren't there in the Mideast. Sharon has wounded the state of Israel incalculably, causing ache and pain not only to Palestinians, but to his people, and to friends of Israel everywhere.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/17/2002 5:01:07 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
MP accuses Sharon of 'barbarism'

All sides condemn West Bank incursions

Nicholas Watt, political correspondent
Wednesday April 17, 2002
The Guardian

The veteran Labour MP and prominent Jewish parliamentarian, Gerald Kaufman, yesterday launched a ferocious attack on the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, denouncing him as a "war criminal" who was staining the Star of David.

Speaking in a Commons debate on the Middle East crisis, in which MPs from across the house condemned Israel's incursions into the West Bank, Mr Kaufman likened Mr Sharon's tactics to the actions of Zionist terrorists in Palestine in the 1940s.

In an emotional speech, in which he described himself as a lifelong friend of Israel, the former shadow foreign secretary said: "Sharon has ordered his troops to use methods of barbarism against the Palestinians ... It is time to remind Sharon that the Star of David belongs to all Jews and not to his repulsive government. His actions are staining the Star of David with blood. The Jewish people, whose gifts to civilised discourse include Einstein and Epstein, are now symbolised throughout the world by the blustering bully Ariel Sharon, a war criminal implicated in the murder of Palestinians in the Sabra-Shatila camp and now involved in killing Palestinians once again."

To nods of approval from MPs, Mr Kaufman condemned Palestinian suicide bombers. But he added that it was important to ask why Palestinians resort to such tactics. "We need to ask how we would feel if we had been occupied for 35 years by a foreign power which denied us the most elementary human rights and decent living conditions."

Mr Kaufman then likened the suicide bombers to the Zionist Irgun and Stern gangs, which launched a series of terrorist attacks in Palestine in the run-up to the creation of the state of Israel in 1948.

"We need to ask what the Jews did in comparable circumstances," he said. "In 1946 the Irgun controlled by Menacham Begin blew up the King David hotel in Jerusalem, slaughtering 91 innocent people. In 1948 the Palestinians denounced what they described as a massacre in the village of Deir Yassin ... The difference between the Deir Yassin massacre and what happened in Jenin is that Deir Yassin was the work of terrorist groups denounced by mainstream Jewish groups. The horrors in Jenin were carried out by the official Israeli army."

A Blair loyalist, Mr Kaufman warned that Mr Sharon's conduct had made it impossible for Britain and the United States to take action against Iraq. "To do so would unite the whole Muslim world against the US, the coalition against terrorism would disintegrate, western economies could suffer a shock comparable to the oil shock of 1973."

Mr Kaufman's attack on the Israeli government were echoed across the chamber. The former Tory cabinet minister, John Gummer, said that a fundamental distinction should be drawn between the actions of the Israelis and that of the Arabs.

"Israel is a state, with the trappings of a state which claims the legitimacy of a state and the more that it rightly claims that legitimacy, the more it has to be judged by the standards of a state and the standards of democracy," he said.

Amid such a serious Middle East crisis it was irresponsible of Washington to take such a tough stance against Iraq, Mr Gummer warned. He criticised the "kind of approach that says that we judge what is in our self-interest and our self-defence and thereby can do anything we like, irrespective either of international law or the UN or indeed frankly of the evidence before us".

Ann Clwyd, the Labour backbencher who has just returned from a visit to the Jenin refugee camp with the UN, said the EU should consider economic sanctions against Israel. Apologising for her croaky voice, caused by dust from Israeli tanks, she said it was not enough for European countries to "simply bleat condemnation".

Ms Clwyd added: "They need to withdraw European ambassadors from Israel. They need to impose an arms embargo as Germany has already done, and they should consider what economic sanctions can be put in place."

Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrats' foreign affairs spokesman, condemned both sides. He also rounded on anti-Semitic groups in Britain which have distributed "hateful" leaflets. "They are an affront to decency, they disfigure democratic society and they disgrace our democracy," he said.

guardian.co.uk



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/17/2002 7:17:35 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 65232
 
BAXTER AUTOPSY POINTS TO MURDER

whatreallyhappened.com

NEW INFO

<<...Note that Baxter was killed with rat shot, essentially a small shotgun shell sized to fit a handgun, which fires spread pattern useful against rodents and snakes. The spread of the rat shot indicates a distance of about 2 feet between the gun and Baxter's head. This clearly argues against a suicide.

Another argument against suicide is the choice of ratshot as the ammo in the gun. In the sort of home Baxter was able to afford to live in, one does not go hunting rats with guns loaded with ratshot; one hires an exterminator. In addition, rat shot is the perfect murder ammunition, because unlike a solid bullet, there is no ballistics test that can match rat shot or snake shot to the gun that fired it.

There are other problems with this autopsy report.

There were shards of glass found on his shirt, on what would have been over the superior RIGHT shoulder, following the removal of his shirt. What was the source of this glass?

Baxter had Ambien--which is given for sleep--in his stomach and in his blood. That means he had taken it very recently; Ambien works very fast; peak levels are usually at about 1.5 hours. Is it likely that someone would take a sleeping pill and then immediately drive somewhere to kill themselves. Why take a sleeping pill if you are going to kill yourself? Ambien is pretty powerful; you don't get in a car to drive someplace.

The abrasions/lacerations of Baxter's hands take on a new meaning when you consider the unexplained glass shards on his superior right shoulder clothing. This suggests a struggle.

Baxter's body was found on 01/25/2002. The specimens were received at the lab on 01/26/2002. The date of the autopsy report is 01/25/2002 (the day BEFORE the lab specimens were delivered), but the autopsy was not notarized until 02/15/2002. It was signed by Dr. Carter on 01/31/2002. Dr. Carter indicated very quickly to the press that it was a suicide, yet did not sign the report until 01/31/2002. There are no initials or indications regarding the processing of the report; no dictation or transcription dates, or transcriptionists initials...>>

__________________
"Like Chinatown, but set in Texas."

madcowprod.com

<<...If you're talking cost-effective damage control, its hard to beat assassination.

At the Houston Yacht Club, where Baxter had taken to virtually living aboard his 72-foot yacht Tranquility Base, one club executive told us:

"Cliff Baxter was not a person who I could ever believe would kill himself. He had boundless energy, a positive attitude, and everything to live for: a wife, kids, and the time and money to enjoy them. He was anxiously awaiting, for example, the delivery of his sleek new boat, which he was going to call Tranquility Base II."

This yacht club skipper, a man with relatively extensive business dealings with Cliff Baxter, stared for a long time at the slate-gray water of Galveston Bay on a dreary February afternoon. Then he shrugged...

"Maybe Cliff just knew too much," he said. "That’s what everyone around here thinks, anyway."

An incredibly explosive political murder—if that’s what it was—would seem to be the very definition of Hard Ball.’ You would think it would be the the ideal topic for a special edition of the show of the same name.

Alas.

It seems as if Mr. Matthews, along with most of his brethren in the mainstream press, find themselves otherwise engaged.

What's going on right now in Houston Texas may eventually come to be seen as the most blatant media clampdown since the death of Vince Foster...>>



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/17/2002 8:42:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Egypt accuses U.S. of having double standard

Mubarak aide labels Sharon a war criminal

By Teresa Castle
San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 17, 2002

Cairo -- In a sign of a widening gap between the Arab world and the United States, President Hosni Mubarak's chief spokesman accused the Bush administration of "playing this game of double standards" in the Israeli- Palestinian conflict.

In an interview with The Chronicle, Nabil Osman lashed out angrily at the Bush administration for not criticizing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon for what the Egyptian called his "war crimes."

"What's being committed now against the Palestinian population in the occupied territories is no less heinous and no less ferocious and no less inhumane," he said, comparing Sharon's West Bank military campaign to the Balkan conflict that landed Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic in a war crimes court in The Hague.

Osman's tough talk also appeared to signal a new intensity in the war of words between the Mubarak government and Israel. Early this month, Mubarak denounced Sharon's incursion into the West Bank and cut off all relations except for those related to the Palestinian Authority.

"The war crimes being committed by Sharon will not lead to an end to the violence," said Osman, jabbing his finger in the air. "They will only lead to revenge and counter-revenge."

As Secretary of State Colin Powell struggles to find a way out of the Middle East stalemate, there are growing signs that Israel's deadly two-week operation in the West Bank is provoking a dangerous sense of outrage in Arab countries that threatens to wipe out any real will for a lasting peace.

Such collective frustration is also evident among moderate nations such as Egypt and Jordan, which have been crucial intermediaries in peace initiatives sponsored by the United States and are central to the Bush administration's hopes of forging a comprehensive regional deal.

Scoffing at the terrorist label that Sharon has pinned on Yasser Arafat in an attempt to discredit his credentials as leader of the Palestinian Authority,

Osman took Israel to task for what he said was cynically invoking the war on terrorism.

"They have abused the American preoccupation with combatting terrorism to try and smear the image of the Palestinian leadership," he charged. "They are trying to blur the eyes of the world -- and the Americans mostly -- to what's happening on the ground."

Osman also predicted that the Israeli assault on the West Bank town of Jenin would rank with the infamous 1982 massacre in the Sabra and Chatilla refugee camps in Lebanon, which left from 800 to more than 2,000 Palestinians dead. At the time, Christian militiamen went on a killing spree after being allowed into the camps by Israeli soldiers then occupying the western sector of Beirut.

Palestinian officials put the death toll in Jenin in the hundreds; Israeli officials say there are about three dozen fatalities so far.

The anger expressed by the Mubarak government has found an even more strident voice in the streets.

"Anyone who fires a bullet at an Israeli is supported," said an activist who helped organize recent anti-Israel demonstrations in Cairo and who asked not to be named. "The Palestinian cause is the strongest radicalizing force in the region."

In Jordan last week, 15,000 protesters called for a "holy war" against Israel. In Egypt, police were called to quell riots by about 10,000 demonstrators in Alexandria, and one student protester was killed when he was shot in the chest.

The governments of Egypt and Jordan have come under enormous pressure to cut off relations with Israel. Protesters are demanding that their leaders withdraw the recent Arab League peace proposal, which offers "normal relations" with Israel in return for Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories and establishment of an independent state of Palestine. Instead, they want their leaders to support the Palestinians not only with words but with funds to buy weapons.

But their governments' unwillingness to sever all ties with Israel is drawing the ire of many protesters. "Such solidarity poses a problem for their own regimes," said the same protest organizer. "The silence of the Arab world is destabilizing."

To be sure, there are still vocal peace advocates in Egypt.

Abdel Monem Said Aly, director of the al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, insists that peace with Israel is essential because of the interdependence of the Israeli and Arab regimes. As a first step, he advocates a troop pullout from the West Bank and an international observer force to separate the belligerents.

He also said he thinks that the window of opportunity for the Arab League proposal has passed and that only a new international conference, as proposed by Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, can pave the way for peace.

But he acknowledged the difficulty of the task. "You cannot negotiate in the environment erected by Sharon," he said. "It is too poisonous."

In a mark of the sudden rise in militancy in Egypt, condemnation of suicide bombers has given way to vocal support for their actions, even from unlikely quarters.

Some government-appointed clerics, who command great respect among the people, recently dropped their long-standing policy of condemning attacks on civilians. Mufti Ahmed al-Tayyeb, a state appointed Muslim cleric, called Palestinian suicide bombers "martyrs of the highest order."

Osman said the Egyptian government is firmly opposed to suicide bombers but added, "We must look at the root causes of such attacks. Why are these people - - young girls of 16 or 18 even -- committing suicide? Because somebody has pushed them to the edge of despair and even beyond. If there was no occupation, we would not be talking about suicide bombing."

______________________
MILITANT MANIFESTO

As governments in the Middle East walk a fine line by condemning Israel while trying to rein in public anger at the Israeli incursion in the West Bank, militant groups are stepping in to fill the void.
Last week, several militant groups published a manifesto declaring that Arab governments had betrayed the Palestinians and called holy war "the religious duty of every Muslim."

"The armies and security apparatus in the Arab and Islamic countries should be with their people, supporting their right of freedom of expression . . . instead of facing them with bullets and batons," the statement read.

The declaration bore the signatures of the leaders of the Lebanese Hezbollah, the founder of Hamas and the leader of Egypt's outlawed Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the heads of militant Islamic groups in Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Syria, Morocco, Iran, Malaysia, Yemen, Sri Lanka, Libya, Iraq, Turkey, Algeria, Tunisia, South Africa and Mauritania.

©2002 San Francisco Chronicle

sfgate.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/17/2002 11:14:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
The elusive al-Qaeda

Apr 17th 2002
From The Economist Global Agenda

Around the world, there is evidence that Islamic terrorism is alive and kicking. A trial in Germany seems set to give an insight into how al-Qaeda works. But it is still unclear how many terrorist suspects are directly linked to Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of the September 11th attacks on New York and Washington

IN HIS latest video, Osama bin Laden’s obligatory beard is not speckled with grey, as it had been in other appearances since the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington last September 11th. It may be, as America's defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld says, that the video is “rather dated”. Unfortunately, even if it is, and is being used by supporters of the Saudi-born terrorist in a clumsy attempt to persuade the world that he is still alive, Mr bin Laden’s pursuers have no evidence to the contrary. Indeed, according to a report in the Washington Post, Mr bin Laden was in the Tora Bora cave complex when it was bombed by America last autumn, but escaped thanks to the failure to send in American ground troops. Elsewhere around the world there seems to be plenty of evidence of the extent and continuing activity of the al-Qaeda network, whatever Mr bin Laden’s fate. And the threat of further terrorist attacks remains, at least according to President George Bush. In a speech on April 17th, he warned of a “spring thaw” that will bring an increase in terrorist activity, and pledged that America will fight this threat “day by day, terrorist by terrorist”.

Al Hayat, an Arabic-language newspaper, earlier this week published a statement by Mullah Mohammed Omar, who is also wanted by the Americans for the protection his Taliban regime gave to Mr bin Laden and his fellow al-Qaeda terrorists. The statement refers to events in Israel and Afghanistan as “a flagrant crusader war”, adding that “the Jews and the Americans are one army on one mission.” So perhaps Mullah Omar is still alive, and fomenting, as well.

The White House posts information on the hunt for al-Qaeda terrorists, as part of its response to terrorism. The US Defence Department and Central Command provide news on their military activities in Afghanistan. The British Ministry of Defence posts news on British troops' involvement in the country.

In Afghanistan itself, American troops have conceded that senior al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders remain at large. Speaking earlier this week, Mr Bush said that, despite the welcome capture of Abu Zubaydah, a key al-Qaeda leader, other “terrorists” were on the loose and “still want to hit us”. Indeed, British commandos, trained in the art of mountain warfare, have just begun an operation to destroy some of the cave networks where the fugitives are believed to be hiding. Rocket attacks on American bases, such as at Khost, confirm that the terrorists are still active, and that they maintain enough fire power to trouble, at the very least, the American forces.

In Tunisia, the government has been forced to admit that a blast that went off last week close to North Africa’s oldest synagogue, which killed 16 people, including 10 German tourists, may not have been an accident, as it had been insisting. The German government briefly arrested a man they said had been speaking to the driver of the truck carrying cooking oil that exploded, whom they suspect of being the perpetrator. The unnamed arrested man, a German who has converted to Islam, is suspected to have links to al-Qaeda, according to the German magazine, Stern. One French citizen was killed as well, and the French authorities, like the Germans, wish to take part in the investigation. It is suspected that Tunisia, the second most popular African tourist destination after South Africa, wanted to portray the blast as an accident in order to protect its tourist industry. European investigators have been taken aback that repair work on the synagogue started almost immediately, leaving little time for forensic examination.

The German authorities are particularly aware of the dangers of Islamic fundamentalism after it emerged that three of the suicide hijackers who had piloted the four passenger planes on September 11th had spent many years in Hamburg. Germany, like France and Britain, is said to be home to so-called “sleeper cells”—groups of sympathisers who lead apparently innocuous lives for years, ready to support or to take part in acts of terror when called upon to do so.

In Frankfurt, five Algerian men are on trial, four of them accused of plotting to cause an explosion at the Christmas market in the French border city of Strasbourg in December 2000. All five are also accused of being members of a terrorist organisation. The men are said by prosecutors to be veterans of al-Qaeda’s training camps in Afghanistan, and all five are said to have spent time there between 1998 and 2000. Prosecutors also claim that they are members of an al-Qaeda-linked group, called the Salafist Group for Call and Combat, although it is not known if they are directly linked to Mr bin Laden. The group is alleged to have worked with Muslim extremists in Britain, Italy, France, Spain and Belgium. Another four men are in French custody, while the alleged mastermind, Abu Doha, an Algerian, is in custody in Britain. The United States is seeking his extradition for his part in a plot to bomb the Los Angeles airport on the eve of the millennium. At the start of the trial, Lamine Maroni, one of the accused, shouted at the court: “You are all Jews. I don’t need you. I don’t need a defence lawyer. God will defend me.”

It is still unclear if these disparate events around the world are linked, whether to each other or to Mr bin Laden’s al-Qaeda. Police everywhere now have a strong incentive not only to look for, but also to claim such links, and they may be exaggerating the extent and nature of al-Qaeda, creating an image of a terrifying, many-headed opponent which is almost impossible to detect or deter. On the other hand, such links, at least in some of these cases, cannot be ruled out either. And yet two things are certain. First, the scale and the geographical extent of the terrorist outrages being planned by Islamic terrorists of one sort or another are much greater than the authorities suspected before September 11th. And second, the terrorists’ inspiration, even if not always their direct commander, has been Osama bin Laden, and he is probably still at large.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/18/2002 12:07:40 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 65232
 
woe Nelly

siliconinvestor.com
Nice div...profit marg Fat...Fat...FAT
T



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/18/2002 2:03:48 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Mission Impossible

<<American power has not been enhanced by the spectacle of Mr. Sharon brazenly ignoring Mr. Bush's call for an immediate withdrawal.>>

The New York Times / Editorial
April 18, 2002

Thanks to Israeli and Palestinian intransigence, Secretary of State Colin Powell headed home yesterday with almost nothing tangible to show for his 10-day exercise in Middle Eastern diplomacy. President Bush now faces not only the prospect of continued bloodshed in the region, but also diminished American clout. Rarely have Washington's calls for restraint been so rudely rebuffed by Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

The simple truth is that both Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Yasir Arafat, the Palestinian leader, brushed off the American effort to end the violence. As Secretary Powell dryly put it, "Cease-fire is not a relevant term at the moment."

Mr. Sharon's new promise to withdraw Israeli troops from most Palestinian areas within a week was late and inadequate. Mr. Bush asked him to pull back immediately more than a week ago, as Mr. Powell was beginning his mission, a time when Israeli cooperation would have been most helpful. By dragging the fighting out, and vowing to conduct future military operations in Palestinian communities as they see fit, Israeli leaders make talk of a truce virtually meaningless.

The short-term security gains Israel has realized with its military sweep through the West Bank will not eradicate the threat of more suicide bombings. And its actions have hurt its political cause, hardening Palestinian anger at the occupation of the West Bank and reinforcing animosity toward Israel throughout the Arab world. Israel's theory that it is waging a common war against terrorism with America does not hold up when its tanks and bulldozers demolish Palestinian neighborhoods.

Secretary Powell got equally little help from the Palestinians and their Arab benefactors. Aside from a condemnation of suicide attacks by Mr. Arafat, which means little if he and other Palestinian leaders fail to act, there was no sign that the Palestinians are ready to end the violence and move back to peace talks. Arab leaders, who could lean on the Palestinian leadership to curb the bombings, greeted Mr. Powell with polite but empty gestures of support.

It is not obvious where the peace track goes from this low point. George Tenet, the director of central intelligence, may travel to the Middle East soon in hopes of restarting the talks between Israeli and Palestinian security forces that he led last year. Mr. Tenet's work produced a plan for cooperative steps that, in theory, could reduce the violence and open the way to renewed political discussions. There is also talk, recently supported by Mr. Sharon, of convening an internal peace conference on the Middle East. None of these ideas are likely to go very far as long as Israeli forces maintain a stranglehold on Palestinian communities in the West Bank and Palestinian bombers are dispatched on their homicidal missions by terror groups like Hamas and the Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades.

The Bush administration bears some responsibility for the depressing state of affairs. Mr. Sharon and Mr. Arafat may be improbable partners for peacemaking, but the administration let the violence grow into a conflagration before it intervened forcefully. By then even American influence was no match for the anger and bloodshed. American power has not been enhanced by the spectacle of Mr. Sharon brazenly ignoring Mr. Bush's call for an immediate withdrawal. We would like nothing more than to affirm Mr. Bush's declaration yesterday that Secretary Powell made progress toward peace, but right now we don't see much reason for optimism.

nytimes.com

_______________________________________



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/18/2002 6:52:56 AM
From: Clappy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
SBG,

stockcharts.com[h,a]daclyyay[dc][pb50!d20,2!f][vc60][iUb14!Uh15,5,5]&pref=G

US Dollar set another near term low.
At least there appears to be some support located just under this area...

I'm not sure I'm going to fall for this push upwards in gold this week.

Dollar may bounce and gold possibly correct some more...

I'm still long tech. For a little while longer at least...

-CG



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50158)4/18/2002 10:48:31 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Re...ME oil

We import 790,000 barrels/day from Iraq
The gasoline mileage bill would have saved 1 mil barrels /day.

US News, 4/1/02

Guess the guys from Big Oil and Big Auto are supporting terrorists.

Rat