Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (9467)	4/17/2002 5:00:14 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

>>. No one was much interested. It has to do with a common interest that both sides have and that is religiously based and more profound than their short term grievances. It would require the designation of Jerusalem as an ancient and universally Holy site. The construction/reconstruction of a universal site of worship...(Solomon's temple/mosque/church/....).<< I think that is a very interesting proposal....since we're talking religion now....<gg> I would say an almost Solomonesque type of answer....The one who's love is true, willing to submit ownership for the preservation of the Holy City...hopefully both "parents" could.

To: one_less who wrote (9467)	4/17/2002 5:02:00 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

It would require the designation of Jerusalem as an ancient and universally Holy site. That was part of the UN proposal for 1947 partitioning proposal, which the Palestinians rejected. Are you suggesting that be resurrected?