SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PCSS who wrote (97211)4/17/2002 6:53:52 PM
From: Lynn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Dear Michael: Well, I hope this challenge doesn't delay things too long. I'd like to cash in on the next dividend paid by HWP which will be slightly more than double what we are getting right now. It will help take away a tiny bit of the pain cause by CPQ's price plunge [and help somewhat take my mind off the dividend slash FTU, now WB, made last year].

Best regards,

Lynn (who is _not_ going into the HPW DRIP)



To: PCSS who wrote (97211)4/17/2002 9:16:49 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
BTW Michael,, one can substitute the word 'asshole' for idiot & fool in some instances,,, better yet just add it to the list,,;-]



To: PCSS who wrote (97211)4/18/2002 3:43:07 AM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Respond to of 97611
 
The problem is of course, that even if Walter is successful in reversing (let alone just not counting) the 17MM Deutschbank votes, the 45MM margin is sufficient to win the day.

This leaves his second count, which is some sort of shareholder fraud theory count, that he has which the court keeps referring to as violation of the share holder franchise.

I assume, without having read Walter's brief that he is arguing that there was so much fraud in the estimates of the value of the combined companies so as to taint the vote so badly that it can not be literally called a vote.

I think the court referred to this argument as something like, "remote".

d.