Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fyodor_ who wrote (77585)	4/17/2002 10:13:41 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 275872

Fyo, re: Celeronized P4 is going to have really poor performance pr MHz, but AMD's current rating scheme is supposed to be based on "True Performance"… Where does that leave future Durons? You've got me, the whole performance issue is confusing, at best. Maybe that's the objective. I'm off the AMD censored thread again. Good luck. John

To: fyodor_ who wrote (77585)	4/18/2002 3:17:08 AM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Celeronized P4 is going to have really poor performance pr MHz, but AMD's current rating scheme is supposed to be based on "True Performance"? Where does that leave future Durons? I had an interesting discussion with a Fry's computer salesman tonight. First, I noticed that they had twice as many AMD systems than anytime in the last 9 months. (Six, four of which were Palomino-based, one Duron, one TBird.) Then I noticed that they were all described by their MHz rather than their performance rating. The laptop area was similarly well-stocked with just about every AMD laptop I'm aware of, including a Compaq one mislabled as "1600 MHz." Just two weeks earlier they only had Sony's clunkier (1 13/16" thick) AMD laptops. I asked the salesman why they didn't advertise the performance rating and he said that they would prefer to explain to customers that AMD machines were just faster than their MHz rating. That explanation sounded a little fishy to me, but, hey, if they doubled the floor space devoted to AMD, I think that will have more positive effect than a misguided "honesty campaign." (Fry's in the past has been the target of consumer activist groups suing them for various "atrocities." IMO, their return and refund policies are far more liberal than anyone that can match their sale prices. I've seen people screaming at sales clerks to get a refund on two year old computer parts. So the company is probably paranoid about being accused of false advertising.) Petz