Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SOITEC, Silicon-On-Insulator TEChnologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kinkblot who wrote (55)	4/18/2002 7:25:37 PM
From: John Finley	Respond to of 83

Reading the different spins it's hard to believe they are talking about the same event <g>. SiGen isn't hiring anybody, so I assume they aren't selling this stuff like gangbusters... JF

To: kinkblot who wrote (55)	12/3/2003 10:41:43 PM
From: kinkblot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 83

Soitec, SiGen Legal Wrangling Comes to an End Electronic News, 12/2/2003 reed-electronics.com soitec.com Soitec will pursue its petition before the U.S. Patent Office to have Patent 564 reissued, as announced back in June, in order to eliminate any enablement problems, with respect to the claims concerned. When granted, the reissued patent will complement the intellectual property (IP) package already licensed to Soitec by the CEA. It includes revised claims that will clarify the enablement of the process using hydrogen alone or in combination with other gas ions in the implantation step to achieve layer transfer. These claims will profit from the same priority date and judicial precedents as that of the 564 patent. The enablement requirement may not have been met (yet) on paper, but the fact that SiGen was able to successfully copy the process demonstrates that they were enabled. Oh, I forgot, that's their own "innovative layer transfer process." So says their legal counsel. sigen.com Imo, it will be an injustice if SOITEC does not ultimately prevail. WT