Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (145405)	4/18/2002 10:55:35 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 1575173

combjelly re: it will almost certainly require subsidies to do it. how high would that be relative to subsidies that we are pouring into the oil producing countries? re: Oh, where? Houston re: I have worked with, and am working with people who have worked in various facets of the oil industry, mainly exploration. I do not qualify to be an armature unless knowing how to spell "oil" counts. :-)) But strangely enough because of the processing techniques that I need for financial applications I got involved with people who are developing those "fuel cells". From what I learned it is still in r&d stage so ...... -Albert

To: combjelly who wrote (145405)	4/19/2002 10:45:55 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575173

Bush-Cheney's energy bill includes 9 billion of our money for big oil (including all their cronies, Halliburton/Brown+Root) to devastate the greatest wild-life refuge we have (proven by recent government study). So WE were expected to pay for that damage. Meanwhile, in the ten years it would take to go on-line we could spend the same money to develop a clean replacement for gasoline, like hydrogen which Bush himself admits is the clean renewable fuel of the future. Well my friend, the future can start to be now if we support leaders like John Kerry. PS - What is this, the ANWAR thread? gg