To: StockDung who wrote (65 ) 4/19/2002 11:00:42 AM From: corstrat Read Replies (1) | Respond to Craig, Shame on you! You did know about the Stockwatch issue when you put your sanguine little post up yesterday. You are obviously a subscriber. Why didn't you tell us about it than? Did you think that you would impress all us peon shareholders with a surprise revelation today with the stock further whacked down? If that was your intention then I apologize for ruining your little surprise by mentioning Mudrys name in my post to you the day before. If you didn't think we were aware of this lame little and I use the word loosely, “article” when all that cheap stock was being provided on Wednesday, then you must think that we are as foolish as those who shorted it. And yes, that had to be shorting because I can assure you that NO ONE holding shares in this tiny little issue that might be intimidated into selling this stock based on Mudry's Canadian rag, would be stupid enough to subscribe to it. So where else would 182,000 share record volume come from?
