SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (9913)4/19/2002 11:06:47 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 21057
 
I don't believe I ever used the word "abnormal". Not sure about JC.

I don't believe homosexual behavior is "normal" and that it is aberrant in that the vast majority of men and women are heterosexual.

It is a bit shallow, IMO, to suggest that just because some type of behavior is "common" it is therefore validated.

Such behavior is unacceptable to me in the way I choose to lead my life. On the other hand, I don't single out homosexuals of either sex for some sort of special disapprobation, I don't condone violence against homosexuals nor do I believe these behaviors can be regulated or should be.



To: epicure who wrote (9913)4/19/2002 11:22:32 AM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
X, I have never used the term "abnormal" in these discussions.

In the context of all that has been said in this general discussion, the only place where I would use that term is with regard to homosexuality itself. I agree with you that words should be chosen carefully, and even then that they may not be entirely accurate. I define homosexuality as a condition characterized by a sexual preference for members of one's own sex, as opposed to the opposite sex. I would use "abnormal" to describe that condition because homosexuals constitute a very small percentage of the population. For example, if that were to be 5%, then "normal" -- the norm, the standard, the usual -- is defined by the other 95% who are heterosexual. This is further reinforced by the obvious fact that human sexual organs are mated to enable heterosexual sex for the purpose of procreation; i.e., that there is a "normal" or a priori form of sex, which is heterosexual.



To: epicure who wrote (9913)4/19/2002 11:38:56 AM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
BTW, the term "abnormal" is not necessarily pejorative...

Although it is often given such a connotation. For example, saying that a man has an "abnormally large penis" need not be considered as pejorative. On the contrary ... ;-)