Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (145495)	4/19/2002 12:00:30 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575552

Wow, amazing how many of the same people are still posting to this board since the last time I was here--over two years ago!

To: TimF who wrote (145495)	4/19/2002 2:27:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575552

If you spend X amount of money on conservation to save 1/4th X per year of 8 years on energy costs then conservation saves money. If you are forced by law or regulation or policy to spend X on conservation even if it saves 1/20th X on energy costs for 10 years then your conservation effort does not save money. Tim, sorry, if anything your latest explanation confuses me more. Let me make it simple. Normally, you spend 1k on gas per year, However, this year you conserve and only use half, you save $500 per year. [EOM] Its very simple math......so don't try to muck it up with conservative politics. <g> ted