Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Dave Gore's Trades That Make Sense -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (5934)	4/19/2002 1:33:49 PM
From: id	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16631

HQNT--devil's advocate here. i am not so much 'impatient' for hqnt to rise in price as i am curious that, given the circumstances well documented here, it has not. the fact that here may not be "many shares to be had" seems an odd explanation for price's failure to rise when it is usually just such a condition (i.e. low float) to which many an explosive price rise is rightly attributed. indeed, the existence of an abundance of shares may partially explain the failure of FONX to rise faster than it is. moreover, i am completely unfamiliar with symbol letter changes during 'routine' audits. if this were common wouldn't it be something we were all familiar with? the fact that it is expected to be temporary doesn't actually tell us anything at all about its meaning. on the other hand, i just bought 1000s to test the 'slow fill' theory and it did seem to fill slightly slower than other trades made today. anyway, i am definitely not bashing hqnt, dave, just doing the sort of questioning that i think you will agree is appropriate for all traders considering a substantial investment in a potential long term hold. id