SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: VAUGHN who wrote (449)4/20/2002 1:30:01 AM
From: russet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 613
 
Oh chit,...

You have been supposedly accumulating TWG and pounding the table on it since $0.70 - $0.80 according to you. You must be deeply in the red.

I can't believe you are comparing the mining costs in South Africa to those in Northern Canada (lets compare hourly wages or costs of supplies). And mining of high value per tonne dykes and alluvial operations in Africa to low grade, unknown value arctic deposits.

Then you quote Jago that can't seem to make up his mind whether there is bort or not at Freightrain. Why should we believe him, or you.

Then you say learned men are accumulating TWG like you,...oh boy! Looks like learned men/women are dumping TWG too at the bid, as much as accumulating.

I think every pumper post like yours deserves a realistic post to counter it. I say you have a 1 in 5 chance of proving an economic deposit for TWG on Baffin,...and the statistics that I brought forth from the PDAC first, and that WillP and the TWG website now confirm,...say its true!

Now you are talking fancies from Freightrain,...as if the colored diamonds are fancies. Give us the proof of this pronouncement. Most colored are worth less than clear. What proof have you that this is not true in Baffin?

I'm with Artie,...show me the values!

Have you looked at the link below,...still think Snap Lake might not have had better than G10's, and is not just some root zone of some eroded pipe. Be careful pumper, because TWG is pumping G10's with high Cr levels as evidence for a higher valued diamond deposit like Snap Lake, counter to your prior claims that high Cr G10's mean nothing,...could be Hermann will start calling them G12's and higher like Randy Turner did (ggggggggggg)

http://www.diamondex.net/flash/kimberlite-anim.htm

I think you need some new experts to consult with.

Having said the above, I'm not anti-TWG longterm. I know they will have to partner or pump another PP soon to fund their ambitious exploration program, so I think the stock price remains weak for now as insiders sell to enable them to take down the next PP. The road ahead is long and lots of ups and downs will occur in the stock price. The summer is long and hot. I think it goes a little lower, but I snagged a few at $0.35. Doesn't mean I won't snag a few more below $0.30 cause they got to let insiders in at a discount (ggggggggggggggggggggggg)

PS,...don't think you should bring up DMX again, considering I panned it at $6.00 plus, and it is now below $4.00 and falling (gggggggggggggg)



To: VAUGHN who wrote (449)4/20/2002 1:55:29 AM
From: Artie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 613
 
"Stink" was never mentioned or referred to. I said "it didn't pass the sniff test." Sometimes things smell too good.

Your statement that you "would confidently compare what TWG has and reported with any diamond junior currently trumpeting its moose pasture" is not comforting to a mooch like me who has had the value of his TWG shares reduced by over 50% while the company is still at square one after a 10 million dollar goose chase at TORNGAT and Jackson Inlet.