Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (164363)	4/20/2002 10:34:10 AM
From: semiconeng	Respond to of 186894

No I didn't. If Microsoft chooses neither, they will continue to see Linux take marketshare in the server market from them. as I stated, Microsoft considers Linux to be "the" threat. With a pretty constant 2% of the desktop market, it's safe to assume that Microsoft is worried there. Consider that apache, which primarily runs on Linux or Unix, runs 65% of the active sites on the web, as of Feb. of this year. netcraft.com The pressure on Microsoft to do something is there. --- The stuff you show proves even more that there would be difficult if not impossible to prove any "qpq" if Microsoft supports X86-64 or not, but that's not the point. The point is, Regardless of what Microsoft does, Support Hammer and X86-64....and Yamhill..... Good for intel. Don't support it.... Good For intel IA-64, bad for Microsoft. It's No Lose for intel. Intel can sit on the sidelines, and benefit regardless. That's what I care about, not Microsoft. Semi