SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (161159)4/20/2002 4:56:27 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius  Respond to of 436258
 
patron, >>I think 2-3 DECADES is ideal

Agree, When a person retires 2 to 3 decades is required. I don't think we can expect a person that has worked only a few years to have more than 3 years of savings for unemployment risk tucked away. If they had bought SA gold stocks in November of 2000 this problem would not exist. <ggg>

Joan



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (161159)4/20/2002 8:02:12 PM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 436258
 
look I was saying for the other guy. I got 50-60 years-g-


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News