To: Mephisto who wrote (3753 ) 4/21/2002 3:07:44 AM From: Mephisto Respond to of 15516 No Greens Need Apply Editorial The New York Times August 19, 2001 From The New York Times While Congress and the country have been debating high-profile environmental issues, like whether to drill for oil in the Arctic, President Bush has been quietly filling key subcabinet posts with conservative activists and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers criticizing the laws they are now sworn to uphold. These appointments should dispel any doubts about Mr. Bush's intention to weaken the strong environmental protections he inherited from the Clinton administration. Unlike his father, who reached into academia and even the environmental community for some of his appointments, Mr. Bush seems determined to return to the Reagan era, when ideologues like James Watt ran the Interior Department and most of the important regulatory jobs were filled with representatives of the businesses being regulated. Nowhere is Mr. Bush's strategy clearer than at Interior, the agency most responsible for protecting the country's natural resources. The department's new deputy secretary, J. Steven Griles, was a top lobbyist for the oil, gas and coal industries, which contributed heavily to Mr. Bush's campaign last year and this year helped shape an energy strategy that would open the public lands to drilling. The new solicitor, William Myers III, was a senior employee of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and represented the nation's grazing interests in lawsuits challenging federal policies that he will now be required to uphold. Bennett Raley, the new assistant secretary for water and science, is likewise a longtime servant of the big landowning and irrigation interests. Lynn Scarlett, the new assistant secretary for policy, was president of the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think tank opposed in principle to most government regulation. All four have won Senate approval. However, there are others with similar professional or ideological pedigrees who have yet to be approved for jobs that wield great power over day-to-day policy. Senate environmentalists will want to pay closer attention to these nominees lest they wake up one morning to find a fox in every coop. Among the most controversial is Donald Schregardus, nominated to be Christie Whitman's enforcement officer at the Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Schregardus has encountered ferocious opposition from environmentalists and several senators because, they say, he did a poor enforcement job when he ran Ohio's E.P.A. This nomination, foisted on Mr. Bush by Senator George Voinovich of Ohio, cannot have pleased Mrs. Whitman. Among other things, Mr. Schregardus strongly opposed a 1998 Clinton administration plan to reduce smog-forming emissions from Midwestern utilities, which Mrs. Whitman endorsed along with other Northeastern governors. Industry's tentacles are everywhere. The nominee for the Agriculture Department's top natural resources post, with authority over the Forest Service, is Mark Rey, an influential Senate staffer who spent nearly 20 years as a lobbyist for the timber industry. Mr. Rey was an architect of the infamous 1995 "salvage rider," which effectively suspended environmental laws and accelerated clear-cutting in old-growth forests, and a determined enemy of President Bill Clinton's plan to place one-third of the national forests off limits to new roads. Over at Justice, meanwhile, the vital job of enforcing the nation's environmental laws awaits Senate approval of Thomas Sansonetti, a member of the Federalist Society, a property rights group, and an energetic lobbyist for coal mining operations and other industries seeking access to public lands. Mr. Sansonetti, who has a low opinion of the Endangered Species Act, once said admiringly of Gale Norton, another libertarian who now runs the Interior Department: "She understands the system. There won't be any biologists or botanists able to come in and pull the wool over her eyes." Tough-guy sentiments like these would sit well with Mike Parker, whom Mr. Bush has named (at Senator Trent Lott's insistence) to oversee the Army Corps of Engineers. In 10 undistinguished years as a Mississippi congressman, Mr. Parker thrice earned zero ratings from the League of Conservation Voters, and was openly contemptuous at a 1998 hearing of Mr. Clinton's efforts to shift the Corps' focus from navigation and flood control to projects like restoring the Everglades and protecting endangered salmon. Mr. Parker, who became a lobbyist for barging interests after he left Congress, said he found it "astounding" that anyone would put environmental missions ahead of commercial projects. That seems a fair summary of the views of many of Mr. Bush's important nominees.nytimes.com