SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (164396)4/21/2002 8:56:55 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
You think Compaq's customers are going to risk their corporate business on a first generation CPU, first generation chip set, unproven everything, with only a 2-way upside possibility - when proven 2-way, 4-way, 8-way, 16-way and up capability are available from Intel and its chip set suppliers?


Of course they won't. They may do some onesey twosey way low cost Hammer servers like they do low cost desktops with AMD. I'd still give about 8 to 5 against that though. As pgerassi pointed out in about a million posts last year, the CPUs aren't a huge amount of server costs anyway, so why screw with all the unknowns you cite.

Tony



To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (164396)4/22/2002 12:12:33 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: You think Compaq's customers are going to risk their corporate business on a first generation CPU, first generation chip set, unproven everything

Yes, Itanium doesn't look like it has much of a chance, does it?

I think the biggest problem for Itanium isn't just the unproven hardware, it's that unproven software will have to be debugged on the unproven hardware.

Hammer can be established as robust and reliable with the existing software base and preserve the decades of internally code built up by companies to give them a competitive advantage, then be extended to new 64-bit software at whatever pace companies wish to move.