Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Allen Furlan who wrote (14357)	4/21/2002 5:58:28 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78523

Allen, A comment on puts. They can be sold naked in an IRA if you use either cash or short term treasuries to back up the amount necessary from an assignment. i have heard there are brokerages that allow this (cash-covered naked puts) in an IRA, but those tend to be brokerages i've never heard of (doesn't mean they aren't good, of course). i have not found a major discount broker i'd want to deal with that allows this strategy, and going to some place that does is not worth the bother for me since i can achieve the same effect by selling ITM calls against common. i have noticed the CCs for dummies thread likes the idea of writing calls against "core" positions, but i personally consider that something of an oxymoron. i wouldn't write a call if i wasn't ready to have the stock called away, because i think "repair" strategies (chasing short calls in an uptrend to avoid being called out) is a loser's game in the long run. and if i am ready to give up a stock at short notice due to a call, then i can hardly consider it a "core position". that may sound like quibbling over semantics, but i think it has pretty important implications for call-writing strategy. my own bias is to use call premiums as a simple discounting mechanism, whereby i will either own a position i am comfortable with at a discount or else get called out (that seems to be what you are describing for your CIEN strategy). that is different than treating calls as a sort of surrogate dividend on a LTBH stock, and sometimes being in the position of having to buy back the call at a much higher price to avoid losing the stock, which i think is a sort of pseudo-naked-call strategy. i voiced my opinion on this issue on the CC thread last summer #reply-16230365