SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (164415)4/22/2002 2:16:51 AM
From: tcmay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
"I agree with the Clawhammer and silly part, but if Compaq and HP decide not to use Itanium, then what's left? I would expect the two companies by now to have a great deal of infrastructure invested in Itanium, and if the merger goes through, that's even more of a reason why the two might combine their Itanium efforts to really make a killing with it in the "enterprise" market (or whatever you prefer to call it)."

First, I have no idea "what's left"...I wasn't addressing that scenario at all. I don't think either plans to abandon IA-64, which is why I said "even if the merger falls through."

Second, your "even more of a reason" argument is odd...of COURSE that's a reason for the merger. Who would think otherwise? I certainly never implied otherwise.

(BTW, this whole point has a "deja vu" feeling to it...I remember almost exactly the same arguments being made by some here a few months ago.)

Bottom line, I expect H-P will use IA-64 regardless of the merger plans (unless Walter Hewlett wins completely and H-P decides to concentrate on inkjet cartridges exclusively). If the merger fails, I would expect Compaq to be scrambling to figure out its next generation strategy, but probably also it would use IA-64. It has a strong networking technology, derived from the VAXCluster work it did many years ago, and which it continued into Alpha and Linux.

--Tim May