Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (145839)	4/22/2002 12:22:09 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574028

But one thing they can not do is guarantee there will be none and with even one spill, the ANWR environment could be screwed up for decades. The Prudhoe Bay field has been working for a long time now and yes there have been spills, but they have not caused wide spread long term environmental damage to Prudhoe Bay. Tim, the Exxon Valdez spill ten years later is still a problem for the effected bay, its wildlife and the village that is on the site. Because its way outside our mainstream news, you don't here much about it. Nonetheless, they all are still struggling. And it only takes one spill. Oil does not break down quickly.......its why plastics are so durable and long lasting. In spite of comments to the contrary, the ANWR is more than just about tundra and caribou..........and it needs to be preserved. ted