Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (10259)	4/22/2002 2:14:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

I saw "Mulholand Drive" over the weekend....wanna argue about it.

To: Neocon who wrote (10259)	4/22/2002 2:23:58 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

You didn't mention possibly the most flagrant and disasterous case: Adolph Hitler.

To: Neocon who wrote (10259)	4/22/2002 9:32:45 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

I have no idea what happened with Bao Dai. Bao Dai's character and track record are well recorded. It is pretty well accepted that the selection of Diem was initiated by the US; I have never seen this questioned in any credible account. Would you say, regarding the election, that the US has the right, or the responsibility, to obstruct the electoral process of another country if we don't like the actual or probable winner of an election? Do we retain that right to this day? To whom does this apply? If Italy or the Netherlands elected a Communist Government, should we go in and install somebody we like? Or does this right of interference extend only to countries inhabited by people who aren't Europeans? If another country disapproves of the results of our electoral process, do they have the right to intervene?