Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (9711)	4/22/2002 6:39:20 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Respond to of 19428

Too bad the guy who compiled that list had no clue about how numerical dates work. The articles supposedly from "January 2000" were actually from December 2000, meaning the whole "bullish" segment covers a two-month period, two-third of which was an up market. From the first column quote to the last "bullish" column (in which Cramer stated he was "biased against telco and telco equipment technology" -- wonder why that bit's not on the page?), the Nasdaq was just about flat, not "down 60%" as the webpage implies. Ironically, the first column quoted (actually from December 1, 2000), was about what it would take for him to BECOME bullish. But I guess Mr. ITulip decided that little detail wasn't useful for his purposes either. The page doesn't seem to have been touched in quite a while, either. I wonder if the guy even had the nads to follow up on his promise to send his poll results to Cramer last May. Regardless, whatever the guy's aim in all that was, it clearly didn't work. JJC's only become more pervasive ever since, now on TV and radio every weeknight. Even TSCM stock has come back from the verge of pennyland to over $3.