Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (10328)	4/27/2002 4:25:48 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10921

Brian, I think that the term "wife" meant KLIC, after all, semibear then continued and removed the make up providing comparative description of KLIC past performance with some leading semi-equip serving the same market. Am I wrong in my interpretation? Zeev

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (10328)	4/30/2002 5:42:51 AM
From: scott_jiminez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10921

Brian - your perceptions were accurate. As you correctly and implicitly understood, no one could have POSSIBLY been referring to my wife (duh) but rather to my supposed attachment to KLIC. And your response was completely right on because the poster was revealing the most outright double standard possible: in the equipment arena, a huge number of folks are 'married to' AMAT to a far greater degree then I was ever attached to KLIC. The fact that AMAT has a price to sales ratio of 6-7 while KLIC's is ~<2, or the fact that AMAT's recent stock split had all the appearances of a desperate attempt to drive the price up (the opposite has occurred), are apparently 'irrelevant' ...and my basis for presenting such info is OBVIOUSLY based upon my nuptials with KLIC! If your criteria to qualify for 'ignore' status is a blatant display of double standards, then your initial opinion was completely on the mark.