Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (145932)	4/22/2002 6:51:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575919

Tim, <What species are they a member of?> He already said it. Unborn babies are nothing more than tadpoles: Message 17366740 *Biologically at the early stage they're not much different from a developing tadpole.* Remember, we were all tadpoles once. Thank Darwin we weren't aborted like the rest of the tadpoles. I feel like catching flies now ... Tenchusatsu

To: TimF who wrote (145932)	4/23/2002 12:51:22 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575919

They don't even take on human characteristics until 5-6 months Not true. Tim, it is true.......a least up until near the end of the first trimester. Now your changing your story. 5-6 months is different from the end of the first trimester. Really? What was my first clue? You said not true in response to AS. I said it is true.......at least up til the end of the first trimester. How is that changing my story? I may be changing AS's story but not my own. I would be hard put to consider them human... Are they living? Yes, like ameobas live but I would not consider them human. What species are they a member of? They look amphibian to me.......what do you think? Have looked at one to see what they look like? ted