SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/23/2002 10:06:47 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
HO HO HO HE HE HE HA HA HA ->Xybernaut Receives Patent Grants in U.S., The Republic of China and Hong Kong; U.S. and Asian Patents Recognize Specific Features That Define Wearable Computers

FAIRFAX, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 23, 2002--Xybernaut(R) Corporation (Nasdaq:XYBR), today announced that in the first quarter of 2002 seven patents have been issued to the Company for mobile/ wearable computing and related technologies in the United States, the Republic of China and Hong Kong.

These U.S. and Asian patents recognize the specific features that define a wearable computer such as removable/transferable core components; docking stations and connector ports and PC Card and network interface connectivity. Stakeholder value continues to be enhanced as the company protects its most valuable assets on an international basis.

In the U.S., the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) issued two Utility Patents and two Design Patents. Utility Patent 6,359,777 relates to a removable component structure for a mobile/wearable computer and Utility Patent 6,351,388 relates to a mobile/wearable computer with PC housing for PC card and network interface.

The Design Patents relate to a docking station for a portable computer and a connector port for a portable computer.

In the Republic of China, Xybernaut received grant 142992 (Personal Communicator) and grant 142471(Core Computer System).

In Hong Kong, the patent grant extends coverage of Xybernaut's original, "Hands Free User Supported Portable Computer," patent for mobile/wearable computers. Similarly, in 2001 Xybernaut announced recognition of various patents in nine European countries.

Recognition of the company's patents in countries beyond North America is an important aspect of Xybernaut's goal to bring wearable computing and related technologies to international markets. These most recent grants in the Republic of China demonstrate considerable momentum and success.

Xybernaut's original wearable computer patent is now recognized and protected in Australia, Canada, nine countries in Europe, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, the Republic of China and the United States. As such, stakeholder value continues to be enhanced as the company protects its most valuable assets on an international basis.

"Xybernaut has more than 700 patent applications pending or granted worldwide covering its innovative technologies, business methods, and concepts," stated Edward G. Newman, chairman, president and CEO of Xybernaut. "Utilizing aggressive licensing policies and close relationships with industry-leading manufacturers, distributors, resellers and system integrators, we continue to position the Company as the gateway to the mobile/wearable computing market on an international basis."

Xybernaut's IP developments are helping to ensure customers' long-term market success and viability by providing practical enhancements related to design and utilization of current and future wearable computing solutions.

These newly granted and recognized patents represent attractive options for licensee or collaborative companies as well as customers in a wide variety of applications related to field force automation.

About Xybernaut Corporation

Xybernaut Corporation is the leading provider of wearable/mobile computing hardware, software and services, bringing communications and full-function computing power in a hands-free design to people when and where they need it. Headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, Xybernaut has offices and subsidiaries in Europe (Germany) and Asia (Japan). Visit Xybernaut's Web site at www.xybernaut.com.

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act").

In particular, when used in the preceding discussion, the words "plan," "confident that," "believe," "scheduled," "expect," or "intend to," and similar conditional expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act and are subject to the safe harbor created by the Act.

Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any of the forward-looking statements.

Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, market conditions, the availability of components and successful production of the Company's products, general acceptance of the Company's products and technologies, competitive factors, timing, and other risks described in the Company's SEC reports and filings.

Third party statements contained herein and information contained on any third party web site are not endorsed by or adopted by Xybernaut, nor has Xybernaut verified their accuracy.

CONTACT:

Xybernaut Corporation, Fairfax

Michael Binko, 703/654-3637

mbinko@xybernaut.com

or

Hill Communications

Chad Hill, 925/945-7910

hillcomm@earthlink.net

SOURCE: Xybernaut Corporation

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page. URL: businesswire.com
04/23/2002 09:23 EASTERN



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/23/2002 11:00:58 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, XYBERNAUT SEEMS TO BE WILTING LIKE A TULIP TODAY.



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/23/2002 1:55:47 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Roy, how about a help Newman make his margin call fund? We can start it right here on SI. Instead of borrowing a million dollars from the company we could have a internet telathon.

Alls we need is Jerry Louis

MARK BERGMAN AND CHRISTINA CAN MAN THE PHONES

WHERE DO I SEND MY BUCK?



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/23/2002 3:05:52 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, A MISTAKE ON MY PREVIOUS POST. i HAD SAID

MARK BERGMAN AND CHRISTINA CAN MAN THE PHONES

IT SHOULD HAVE SAID

MARK BERGMAN AND CHRISTINA CON MAN THE PHONES



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/24/2002 8:37:59 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
$1.12 another new low. According to Yahoo



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/24/2002 11:53:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Roy, could you tell me what they meant when they said "Xybernaut Corporation (collectively referred to as the "Manipulated Securities")."?

whafh.com

"Bear Stearns's relationship with some of the introducing brokers commenced as early as December 1992. The Introducing Brokers, as of the time they associated themselves with Bear Stearns, were sometimes known in the securities industry as "bucket shops" or "chop shops." The Introducing Brokers included, but were not limited to: Corporate Securities Inc.; First Cambridge Securities Corp. (defunct); Hillcrest Financial Corp., a/k/a HFC Capital Corp. (defunct); Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Inc.; Kensington Wells Incorporated (defunct); Lew Lieberbaum & Co. (defunct); Meyers Pollock Robbins, Inc. (defunct); Noble International Investments, Inc.; Paragon Capital; PCM Securities (defunct); A.R. Baron & Co., Inc. (defunct); D. Blech & Co. (defunct); Rooney-Pace Inc. (defunct); Stratton-Oakmont, Inc. (defunct); and Sterling Foster & Co. (defunct)(collectively, the "Introducing Brokers").
The Introducing Brokers engaged in a pattern of fraudulent conduct with regard to the Manipulated Securities. Bear Stearns, as clearing broker to the Introducing Brokers, knew or recklessly disregarded that the Introducing Brokers were engaged in a concerted course of conduct designed to defraud investors and violate the federal securities laws. Bear Stearns recklessly or consciously joined with each of the Introducing Brokers in defrauding plaintiffs and the Class in order to collect huge fees for performing clearing services for the Introducing Brokers as well as to gain enormous profits from transactions with the Introducing Brokers as more fully set out below.
This massive fraud focused on the Manipulated Securities, which included, but were not limited to: Advanced Surgical Inc.; Advanced Voice Technologies, Inc.; Applewoods Inc.; Apogee Robotics, Inc.; Aquanatural Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Ariad Pharmaceuticals Corp.; BioSepra, Inc.; Bristol Technology Systems, Inc.; Chemex Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Children's Wonderland, Inc.; Com/Tech Communication Technologies Inc.; Cypros Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Dollar Time Group, Inc.; DNA Plant Technology Inc.; Ecogen, Inc.; Embryo Development Corporation; Envirogen Corp.; Envro, Inc.; Eastco Industrial Safety, Co.; First Team Sports Inc.; Genemedicine, Inc.; Globus Group, Inc.; Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Gum Tech International Inc.; Hauppauge Digital Inc.; Help At Home Inc.; HemaSure, Inc.; ICOS Corp.; IFS International Inc.; Innovir Laboratories, Inc.; Intelligent Surgical Lasers, Inc.; Iatros Health Network Inc.; Krantor, Corp.; Kushner- Locke, Company; Kitchen Bazaar, Inc.; LaJolla Pharmaceutical Co.; Lasergate Systems, Inc.; Liposome Technology Inc.; LXR Biotechnology Corp.; ML Direct Inc.; Microprobe Corp.; Ministor Peripherals, Inc.; Neoprobe Corp.; NeoRx Corp.; Neurogen Corp.; New Vision Technology Corp.; Nu-tech Bio-Med Inc.; Pacific Animation Imaging Corp., later known as Strategic Solutions Group; Paperclip Imaging Software Inc.; Paramark Enterprises, Inc.; Symbollin, Inc.; Pharmos Corp.; Procept Inc.; Retrospettvia Inc.; Texas Biotechnology Corp.; Universal Automotive Industries, Inc.; Voxtel Advanced Mammography Systems Inc.; Videolan Technologies, Inc.; XeChem International, Inc.; and Xybernaut Corporation (collectively referred to as the "Manipulated Securities")."

whafh.com



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/25/2002 12:14:35 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Roy, you missed this article->Wearable computing to defeat terrorism
By Thomas C Greene in Washington

newsop.net

Wearable-computing hypemeisters Xybernaut are at it again, this
time persuading former Virginia Governor James Gilmore to serve
as pitch man for the company's ambition to equip US officials and
law enforcement officers with wearable devices to root out terrorists. Gilmore made an appearance at the seventh annual International
Conference on Wearable Computing (ICWC), which is part of the
COMDEX Chicago trade show. Xybernaut apparently is paying for
the ICWC bit as a prime marketing vehicle. Quoting the Xybernaut press release: "Wearable computing may
play a major role in homeland security and the fight against
terrorism, and could help boost the global economy, James S.
Gilmore III, chairman of the Congressional Advisory Panel to Assess
Weapons of Mass Destruction and Domestic Response, stated here
today." [my emphasis] "According to Gilmore, wearable computers are currently providing
real
world examples of how technology can be leveraged as part of the
U.S. anti-terrorism campaign to ensure homeland security." [my
emphasis] The company likes to work in a few weasel words whenever it
communicates to current and potential investors in this manner, but
hopes you'll read over them and imagine that some commercial
breakthrough is just around the corner. Thus we hear breathless announcements about missions to Mars
relying heavily on Xybernaut gear, when in fact all that's happening is
that a few lunatics are going to freeze their ***** off in the Canadian
tundra and see how the kit holds up. This is the same Xybernaut that sued an online critic, Dan Whatley,
in absentia and won a judgment of $450,000. Whatley made a few
disparaging remarks on a BBS, and was blindsided by the
company's legal beagles. We also find the company backing away from a PCWorld story,
which it had originally linked on its Web site, where someone told a
reporter quite untruthfully that Xybernaut kit was scheduled to be
used in airport security within three months' time. As it turns out, "there were no contracts and that [] discussion with
PCWorld.com had focused only on 'ideal applications' for the
device, not planned deployments." Too bad the reporter wasn't let in
on the secret. And now we've got homeland defence enhanced with robocops
scurrying about (on Ginger?) and communing intimately with the
Great Database via sensors in their shorts and displays on their Ray
Bans. Of course we see this sort of thing all the time in the movies, which
helps make it appear more plausible when a former governor stands
up in front of an auditorium full of Star Trek weenies and pitches
pie-in-the-sky gizmos as legitimate anti-terror tools. Perhaps Xybernaut investors should persuade the company to shift
over to doing Hollywood special effects, where their toys will be a hit,
and where the market is a good deal more reliable than missions to
Mars. ®



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/25/2002 11:12:37 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
vidicom-tv.com



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/25/2002 4:43:20 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
One is the loneliest number that you'll ever do
Two can be as bad as one,
its the loneliest number since the number one
No is the saddest experience you'll ever know
Yes is the saddest experience you'll ever know
cause one is the loneliest number that you'll ever know
one is the loneliest number even worst then two
yeah

Its just no good anymore since you went away
now I spend my time just making up rhymes of yesterday
one is the loneliest number
one is the loneliest number
one is the loneliest number
since you went away
since you went away

(one is the loneliest number since you've gone away)
one is the loneliest number
one is the loneliest number
one is the loneliest number
since you've gone away

Its just no good anymore since you went away
now I spend my time just making up rhymes of yesterday
one is the loneliest number
one is the loneliest number
one is the loneliest number
since you went away
since you went away



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 2:50:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, HERE IS A RESEARCH REPORT ON CHRISTINA SKOUSEN, individually and doing business as CSK Securities Research WHO ALSO WROTE A RESEARCH REPORT ON XYBR. SHE STILL COULD GET IT FOR XYBR AS WELL AS XYBR WHO PUBLISHED AND ENDORSED THE REPORT ON THEIR WEB SITE. CHRISTINE GOT XYBR WARRANTS WHICH SEEMS TO BE THE USUAL COMPENSATION.

MICHAEL R. MACPHAIL (Colo. Attorney Reg. No. 26382)
KELLI FARRAND CHAN (Colo. Attorney Reg. No. 19756)

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
1801 California Street, Suite 4800
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-1000
Fax: (303) 844-1010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,
vs.
CHRISTINA SKOUSEN, individually and
doing business as CSK Securities Research,

Defendant.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO.
COMPLAINT


Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") alleges the following facts in support of its complaint against the defendant, Christina Skousen, also d/b/a CSK Securities Research ("Skousen").

I. SUMMARY

1. Between May 1999 and December 2000, Skousen, a self-styled "analyst" with a high school education and no formal securities training, wrote research reports touting eight microcap companies. Skousen's reports for seven of the companies contained false and misleading financial and stock price projections. The projections lacked a reasonable basis because, among other reasons, all of the companies had poor financial track records, and four of the companies were the subject of going concern audit opinions.

2. Skousen's revenue projections exceeded the companies' most recently reported revenue figures by as much as 260,913%, and exceeded the companies' most recently reported income figures by as much as 30,089%. Skousen's reports additionally failed to disclose that six of the companies required significant additional financing, which was not assured, to implement their business plans or continue in operation. Skousen's reports for the same seven companies also contained arbitrary projected stock prices, which exceeded the companies' current stock prices by as much as 18,650%.

3. In addition, Skousen falsely represented that one company was "well-capitalized" when it had previously disclosed that it required additional working capital in order to continue as a going concern.

4. Moreover, Skousen, who typically was paid in cash for all of the reports, failed to disclose her receipt of compensation in two instances where she personally published the reports.

5. Skousen's reports caused the price and/or volume of the stock of six of the seven companies to increase significantly in the short term.

6. Skousen has, directly and indirectly, engaged in, and unless restrained and enjoined by this Court will engage in transactions, acts, practices and course of business that violate Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. § 77q(b)] and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5] promulgated thereunder.

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

7. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77u(a)] and Sections 21(e) and 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§78u(e) and 78aa]. Venue lies in this Court pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Securities Act and Section 27 of the Exchange Act.

8. In connection with the transactions, acts, practices, and courses of business described in this Complaint, the defendant, directly and indirectly, has made use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce, of the mails, and/or of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce.

9. Defendant Skousen resides within this judicial district. Additionally, certain of the transactions, acts, practices and courses of business constituting the violations of law alleged herein occurred within this judicial district.

III. DEFENDANT

10. Christina Skousen, age 49, resides in Novato, California. Doing business as CSK Securities Research ("CSK"), she writes analyst research reports regarding microcap companies. Skousen's formal education consists of one year of college and 18 months of secretarial training at a business college. Skousen has had no formal training in analyzing financial statements or stocks.

IV. FACTS

SKOUSEN'S RESEARCH REPORTS

11. Between May 14, 1999 and December 4, 2000, Skousen wrote research reports touting eight companies. Reports touting four companies, Packetport.Com, Inc. ("Packetport"), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. ("Nanopierce"), Integrated Communication Networks, Inc. ("Integrated") and Searchhound.Com, Inc. ("Searchhound"), were issued under the name of Stockreporter.de and did not mention Skousen's name or otherwise suggest her involvement. The dates of these reports are set forth in Appendix A.

12. Stockreporter.de's principals posted Skousen's reports on their Internet website and issued press releases announcing the reports. The principals of the Stockreporter.de website have been enjoined by a U.S. District Court from future violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court's order further required the defendants to pay disgorgement and civil penalties. SEC v. Torsten Prochnow d/b/a Stockreporter.de et al., No. C00-3199-MJJ (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2000).

13. Skousen also wrote reports touting four other companies (Infe.Com, Inc. ("INFE"), Winners Internet Network, Inc. ("Winners"), AXYN Corp. ("AXYN") and MyWeb Inc.Com. ("MyWeb") under the name CSK. Skousen printed copies of these reports and distributed them to the touted companies.

14. Skousen received approximately $5,000 for each report as compensation except for INFE, which agreed to pay her but did not do so.

15. Skousen received compensation for the CSK reports either directly from the companies or indirectly through the Stockreporter.de principals. Two of the four CSK reports (Winners and MyWeb) failed to disclose Skousen's compensation.

16. In preparing her reports, Skousen typically interviewed officers of each company to obtain information regarding the company's business and competitors. Skousen also reviewed documents provided by the company, including business plans and the company's public filings with the Commission.

BASELESS FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS

17. Skousen's reports touting seven companies, INFE, Winners, AXYN, Packetport, Nanopierce, Integrated and Searchhound, contained false and misleading financial projections. The reports predicted that these companies would realize revenues of as much as $1,025,000,000 within one and four fiscal years of the dates of the reports, and that six of the companies would realize income of as much as $425 million within the same periods. See Appendix A for details.

18. The reports stated that Skousen's financial projections were "conservative" or "very realistic and achievable," or that her projections could "easily" be exceeded.

19. The financial projections lacked a reasonable basis because they were not supported by each company's historical financial performance. The revenue projections for four of the seven companies (AXYN, Packetport, Integrated and INFE) lacked a reasonable basis because they represented increases of as much as 260,913% from each company's most recent yearly revenue figures. See Appendix A for details.

20. Skousen projected that a fifth company, Nanopierce, would achieve revenues of as much as $123 million, whereas it had reported zero revenues during the previous fiscal year. See Appendix A for details.

21. Skousen projected that two companies (Winners and Searchhound) would achieve revenues that represented increases of as much as 4,703% from the revenues reported during the first nine months of each company's fiscal years. See Appendix A for details.

22. Skousen's income projections lacked a reasonable basis because they represented increases of as much as 30,089% from the companies' most recent income figures. See Appendix A for details.

23. In addition, four of the companies (AXYN, Nanopierce, Winners and INFE) were the subject of going concern opinions by the companies' auditors. Searchhound's management had expressed doubt in a November 15, 2000 Form 10Q-SB filed with the Commission about its ability to continue as a going concern. None of Skousen's reports disclosed these adverse facts.

24. Skousen's projections for six of the seven companies (AXYN, Nanopierce, Winners, Searchhound, Integrated, and Packetport) were additionally undermined by the fact that the projections were contingent upon the issuers' receipt of substantial funding, which was not assured.

25. The companies' business plans stated that the projections were based on assumptions that the issuers would receive significant additional financing. None of the reports prepared by Skousen disclosed this contingency.

26. Skousen's projections for two of the companies (Winners and INFE) lacked a reasonable basis because, among other things, they were inconsistent with the companies' internal projections and/or Skousen's own previous projections.

27. Skousen's financial projections for Winners were significantly higher than management's internal projections.

28. Skousen's financial projections for INFE were inconsistent with management's internal projections. For the first year following the issuance of the INFE report, Skousen projected revenues of $240 million and net income of $22,538,000; but the company projected revenues of only $85 million and net income of $4.2 million for that year.

29. Just six weeks before she wrote this report, Skousen had written a report touting INFE, which was issued under the name Stockreporter.de, which included the much lower projections of management.

BASELESS STOCK PRICE PROJECTIONS

30. Skousen's reports predicted that the price of seven companies' stocks would reach prices as high as $105 per share between one and three years. See Appendix A for details.

31. These stock price projections lacked a reasonable basis because they were not based on any rational methodology and none of the stock price projections was supported by the companies' historical stock prices.

32. Skousen's stock price projections represented increases of as much as 18,650% from the companies' then-current stock prices. See Appendix A for details.

33. The Winners stock price projections were based on the assumption that the number of the company's issued and outstanding shares of stock would remain constant at 16 million. This was a false assumption because the company was planning significant private placements.

34. None of the companies' stock prices has reached the stock prices predicted by Skousen.

FALSE STATEMENT ABOUT SEARCHHOUND'S FINANCIAL CONDITION

35. Skousen's report for Searchhound stated that the company was "well-capitalized."

36. This statement was false since a Form 10Q-SB filed by Searchhound with the Commission just two weeks before the release of this report stated that the company would require additional working capital to remain a going concern.

FAILURE TO DISCLOSE COMPENSATION

37. Skousen prepared and published a report regarding MyWeb on or about May 14, 1999.

38. MyWeb paid Skousen $5,000 to prepare and publish this report.

39. Skousen's MyWeb report did not disclose her receipt of this compensation.

40. The Stockreporter.de principals paid Skousen $5,000 to prepare a report regarding Winners. The $5,000 came from the sale of Winners stock received by the principals.

41. Skousen's Winners report did not disclose her receipt of this compensation.

MARKET REACTION

42. Following the release of Skousen's reports, the stock price and/or volume of six of the seven touted issuers increased significantly.

SKOUSEN ACTED FRAUDULENTLY

43. Skousen knew that her financial projections were undermined by the companies' historical financial performance and need for financing and therefore lacked a reasonable basis.

44. Skousen was aware of each companies' historical financial performance and the going concern opinions regarding four companies at the time she wrote her reports. She also knew about the six issuers' need for financing, yet she failed to disclose their need for financing in her reports.

45. Skousen was aware of the then-current stock prices of these issuers when she wrote her reports and therefore was reckless in not knowing that these historical prices did not provide a basis for her predicted stock prices.

46. Skousen had reviewed the most recent Form 10Q-SB regarding Searchhound and therefore knew that the company was not "well-capitalized."

47. Skousen continued to issue reports containing baseless financial and stock price projections for several months after May 2000, when she was first made aware of the Commission staff's concerns about her projections.

V. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5

[15 U.S.C. § 78 j (b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]

48. Paragraphs 1 through 47 are hereby realleged and incorporated by reference.

49. Defendant Skousen directly and indirectly, with scienter, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, by use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or by use of the mails, has employed devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud; has made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or has engaged in acts, practices, or courses of business which have been and are operating as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers or sellers of such securities.

50. By reason of the conduct described above, Skousen violated, is violating, and unless restrained and enjoined will violate Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [15 U.S.C. § 78 j (b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5].

VI. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act

[15 U.S.C. § 77q(b)]

51. Paragraphs 1 through 47 are hereby realleged and incorporated by reference.

52. Defendant Skousen, by use of the means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly, published, gave publicity to, or circulated communications, which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, described such securities for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly from an issuer without fully disclosing such consideration and the amount thereof.

53. By reason of the conduct described above, Defendant Skousen has violated, is violating and, unless restrained and enjoined, will continue to violate Section 17(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(b)].

VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that the Court:

A.

Find that Skousen committed the violations alleged.

B.

Enter an injunction, in a form consistent with Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, permanently restraining and enjoining the defendant and persons in active concert or participation with her, from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §78j(b)], Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5], and Section 17(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(b)].

C.

Order Defendant and her agents, servants, employees and attorneys to disgorge all ill-gotten gains received or benefits, totaling $30,000, received from her alleged illegal conduct with respect to Packetport, Nanopierce, Integrated, Searchhound, Winners, and AXYN, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as provided by law.

D.

Order Defendant to pay civil penalties pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)] and Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] in an amount to be determined by the Court.

E.

Grant such other relief, as this Court may deem just or appropriate.

Dated: February 27, 2002.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________
Kelli Farrand Chan
Michael R. MacPhail
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission


sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 2:52:02 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
1. Between May 1999 and December 2000, Skousen, a self-styled "analyst" with a high school education and no formal securities training, wrote research reports touting eight microcap companies. Skousen's reports for seven of the companies contained false and misleading financial and stock price projections. The projections lacked a reasonable basis because, among other reasons, all of the companies had poor financial track records, and four of the companies were the subject of going concern audit opinions.



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 2:53:08 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
2. Skousen's revenue projections exceeded the companies' most recently reported revenue figures by as much as 260,913%, and exceeded the companies' most recently reported income figures by as much as 30,089%. Skousen's reports additionally failed to disclose that six of the companies required significant additional financing, which was not assured, to implement their business plans or continue in operation. Skousen's reports for the same seven companies also contained arbitrary projected stock prices, which exceeded the companies' current stock prices by as much as 18,650%



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 2:54:40 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
10. Christina Skousen, age 49, resides in Novato, California. Doing business as CSK Securities Research ("CSK"), she writes analyst research reports regarding microcap companies. Skousen's formal education consists of one year of college and 18 months of secretarial training at a business college. Skousen has had no formal training in analyzing financial statements or stocks.



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 2:57:24 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
LITTLE CHRISTINA'S Xybernaut Research Report
prnewswire.com



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 3:07:24 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Because of the anticipated development-stage revenues, ramp-up of production and marketing costs this year, we are anticipating total revenues of between $1.0 million and $1.6 million, a net loss of $3.9 million, or $0.29 per share, for the year-ending December 31, 1996. This should be compared to 1997 projected total revenues of between $28 and $40 million, net income between $1.0 and $5.0 million, or $0.07 to $0.35 earnings per share. For 1998, we are projecting total revenues between $90 and $120 million, with net income coming in between $14.0 and $19.2 million, or $0.97 to $1.32 per share. These growth rates are extremely impressive, but we believe they are not out of line for the rapid growth stage anticipated for this newly emerging company that possesses innovative, breakthrough technology. We are recommending the purchase of XYBR for aggressive investors with a two-year or more investment period. prnewswire.com



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/29/2002 3:23:35 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, CRIMINAL AND CONMAN REGIS POSSINO'S ADDRESS IS 2224 MAIN STREET SANTA MONIC, CALIFORNIA. THE SAME ADDRESS AS IS ON THIS BUY REPORT. web1.archive.org



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)4/30/2002 9:44:30 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, NEED A GOOD LAUGH?->Momentum Alerts and XYBR Rumors 04/30/02

By: jimbous
30 Apr 2002, 09:12 PM EDT Msg. 58385 of 58385

Momentum Alerts and XYBR Rumors 04/30/02
Date: 4/30/2002 12:13:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: TradersGold@lb.bcentral.com
Reply-to: TradersGold-feedback-653@lb.bcentral.com

$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Top Momentum Stock Alert ADSX continues to add gains once again...Yesterdays pre-open alert on the rise today...

Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. Last: 1.39 Change: +0.13 Volume: 5,319,500

$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Special Rumors Report ~ Xybernaut Corp. XYBR ~

Xybernaut Corporation Last: 1.10

Combat Soldier Standard Edition Wearable Computer...

Xybernaut Corp --- XYBR --- Rumors Alert ---

Several recent news clips are leading to increasing speculation that Xybernaut is close to further developments with the U.S. Military and Homeland Defense Initiative for mobile/wearable computers.

Almost a year ago XYBR began experimental studies with the Military and the potential for a very large military contract with possibilities ranging as large as every combat soldier being equiped with wearable computing technology.

Xybernaut Corporation (NASDAQ: XYBR), the leader in wearable computing and communications solutions, announced that it had completed an initial shipment of wearable computers to the U.S. Navy and National Guard to support feasibility studies targeted at reducing repair time for selected aircraft and weapons systems by providing hands-free reference material and the ability to teleconference with remote experts.

Xybernaut's services and Xybernaut MA® wearable computers are available to the U.S. Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines and National Guard.

See recent deveopments...

April 10, 2002--Xybernaut (R)Corporation (NASDAQ:XYBR - news) today announced that the Honorable Jim Gilmore, former Governor of Virginia, has been appointed to Xybernaut's corporate Board of Directors.

Gilmore, who is currently chairman of the Congressional Advisory Panel to Assess Weapons of Mass Destruction and Domestic Response, recently participated as a keynote speaker at the 7th annual International Conference on Wearable Computing (ICWC) where he discussed technology's role in reviving the U.S. and global economies.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Wearable computers are currently providing real world examples of how technology can be leveraged as part of the U.S. anti-terrorism campaign to ensure homeland security. Experimental exercises using wearable computers, which are being employed by U.S. Army troops in training and simulated battlefield situations at Ft. Benning's Dismounted Battlespace Battle Lab, as a prime example of how wearable technology can be deployed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Xybernaut Corporation is the leading provider of wearable/mobile computing hardware, software and services, bringing communications and full-function computing power in a hands-free design to people when and where they need it. Headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, Xybernaut has offices and subsidiaries in Europe (Germany) and Asia (Japan).

April 23, 2002 -- Xybernaut Corporation (Nasdaq: XYBR), today announced that in the first quarter of 2002 seven patents have been issued to the Company for mobile/ wearable computing and related technologies in the United States, the Republic of China and Hong Kong.

Xybernaut has more than 700 patent applications pending or granted worldwide covering its innovative technologies...

~~~RECENT TOPICS~~~

IBM and Xybernaut's shared commitment to wearable computing in field force automation and introduce sessions on vertical industry applications of wearable computing.

Military and government representatives from armed forces branches and civilian agencies will discuss wearable computers and their role in national defense and public services.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1st Alert---XYBR--- Potential Large Contract Speculation



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)5/2/2002 3:02:02 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, MORE GOOD NEWS ABOUT CHRISTINA WHO WROTE THE XYBR BUY REPORT.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 45856 / May 1, 2002
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
FILE NO. 3-10775

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of

Christina Skousen,

Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:

ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate and in the public interest to institute public administrative proceedings against Christina Skousen ("Skousen" or "Respondent") pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").

II.

In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the Commission has determined is in the public interest to accept. Solely for the purpose of this proceeding, and any other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission or to which the Commission is a party, Skousen, without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over her and over the subject matter of this proceeding, which is admitted, consents to the issuance of this Order Instituting Public Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions ("Order") and to the entry of the findings and the imposition of the remedial sanctions as set forth below.

III.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that said proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted.

IV.

Based on this Order and Skousen's Offer, the Commission finds the following:

A. Skousen, age 48, resides in Novato, California. From January 1990 to November 1999, Skousen held Series 7 and 64 securities licenses. She worked as a registered representative for various broker-dealers from 1990 to 1993. She has been employed as a writer of research reports since 1995.

B. Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. ("Nanopierce"), formerly known as Sunlight Systems Ltd. and Mendell Denver Corp., is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Nanopierce claims to be engaged in the design, development and licensing of products using its patented technology, which improves electrical, thermal and mechanical characteristics of electronic products. Nanopierce's common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (a service of Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.) ("Bulletin Board"), and the company has filed reports with the Commission since July 1996.

C. Winners Internet Network, Inc. ("Winners") is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Liechtenstein. Prior to March 2001, Winners was headquartered in St. Augustine, Florida. Winners claims to provide online financial processing for internet casinos using Winners' proprietary processing software and plans to provide financial processing and internet banking services to other e-commerce companies. Winners' common stock is traded on the Pink Sheets, and the company has filed reports with the Commission since December 1999.

D. Infe.Com, Inc. ("INFE"), formerly known as Infocall Communications Corp., is a Florida corporation headquartered in Vienna, Virginia. INFE claims to provide core infrastructure services, access to working capital, and merger partners for emerging growth public and private companies that focus in technology. INFE's common stock is traded on the Bulletin Board, and the company has filed reports with the Commission since December 1999.

E. Searchhound.Com ("Searchhound"), formerly known as Pan International Gaming, Inc., is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. Searchhound claims to be an Internet property that provides a content filtering search engine for the Internet under the trade name of Searchhound.com. Searchhound's common stock is traded on the Bulletin Board, and the company has filed reports with the Commission since February 1998.

F. Myweb Inc.Com. ("MyWeb") is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Malasia. MyWeb claims to be "a major Asian Internet online services company which utilizes alternative access devices as a means of distributing portal services" to customers. In 1999, the company, then known as Asia Media Communications, Ltd., acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of a Malasian entity, and changed its name to MyWeb. MyWeb's common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange, and the company has filed reports with the Commission since 1988.

G. Nanopierce, Winners, INFE, Searchhound and MyWeb are penny stocks within the meaning of Sections 15(b)(6) and 3(a)(51) of the Exchange Act and Rule 3a51-1 thereunder.

H. On March 6, 2002, in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Christina Skousen, individually and doing business as CSK Securities Research (Civil No. C02-0894-VRW ) (N.D. Cal.), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered a final judgment permanently enjoining Skousen from violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

I. The injunction was based on the Commission's allegations that between approximately May 1999 and December 2000, Skousen wrote research reports touting eight microcap issuers, including Nanopierce, Winners, INFE, Searchhound and MyWeb. Skousen's reports for all of the issuers except MyWeb contained false and misleading financial and stock price projections. The projections lacked a reasonable basis because, among other things: (1) they were not supported by the financial track records of the issuers; (2) certain of the issuers, including INFE and Nanopierce, were the subject of going concern audit opinions; and (3) six of the issuers, including Nanopierce, Winners, and Searchhound, required significant additional financing, which was not assured, to implement their business plans or continue in operation. Skousen's reports for the same issuers also contained arbitrary projected stock prices. In addition, Skousen falsely represented that Searchhound was "well-capitalized" when it had previously disclosed that it required additional working capital in order to continue as a going concern. Skousen's reports touting Winners and MyWeb failed to disclose compensation that she directly or indirectly received from these issuers. Skousen's reports caused the price and/or volume of the stock of six of the seven issuers to increase significantly in the short term.

J. Skousen participated in offerings of the penny stocks of Nanopierce, Winners, INFE, Searchhound and MyWeb.

V.

Based on the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to impose the sanctions specified in the Respondent's Offer.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent be, and hereby is, barred from participating in any offering of a penny stock, including: acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent or other person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer or issuer for purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock; or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 05/02/2002



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)5/2/2002 3:05:47 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent be, and hereby is, barred from participating in any offering of a penny stock, including: acting as a promoter, finder, consultant, agent or other person who engages in activities with a broker, dealer or issuer for purposes of the issuance or trading in any penny stock; or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock.



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)5/2/2002 3:39:58 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
xyber not "STRONG BUY"!!->COMMISSION IMPOSES PENNY STOCK BAR AGAINST CHRISTINA SKOUSEN

On May 1, the Commission entered an Order imposing a penny stock bar
against Christina Skousen, a resident of California. The Order imposes
a penny stock bar against Skousen based on the entry of an injunction by
the U.S. District Court (SEC v. Christina Skousen, individually and
doing business as CSK Securities Research, C02-0894-VRW, N.D. Cal.,
March 6, 2002).

The Commission's Order is based on the entry of an Order on March 6,
2002 by the U.S. District Court (Northern District of California, San
Francisco Division), enjoining Skousen from violating Section 17(b) of
the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Skousen consented to
the entry of the Order without admitting or denying the allegations in
the Commission's complaint. See Litigation Release No. 17379 (February
25, 2002).

According to the Commission's Order, the injunction was based on the
Commission's allegations that Skousen, among other things, through
analyst reports, made baseless financial and stock price projections
regarding eight publicly held companies, four of which were penny stock
companies, while participating in offerings of the penny stocks.

The Commission barred Skousen from participating in any offering of a
penny stock pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act. Skousen
consented to the entry of the Order without admitting or denying the
Commission's findings. (Rel. 34-45856; File No. 3-10775)



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)5/2/2002 5:40:41 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
"Our research showed that CSK Securities is a business run from the home of Christina and Neal Kohlhaas, who started the company five years after being declared bankrupt in San Diego."

RE: REGIS POSSINO: As published in Offshore Alert on February 26, 1999.
Mezzanine Capital linked to manipulation of penny stocks

A Bermuda Stock Exchange-listed company whose minority shareholders include subsidiaries of the Bank of Bermuda and financial services firm Lines Overseas Management is caught up in what appears to be a scheme to defraud investors on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market, we can disclose.

We have uncovered an astonishing list of proven abuses and allegations of fraud and dishonesty against individuals and companies associated with Bermuda-registered investment holding company Mezzanine Capital Ltd., including its Chairman and President, Eric Chess Bronk, although we have found nothing to incriminate LOM or the Bank of Bermuda.

Bronk, some of Mezzanine's other shareholders and firms closely-linked with Mezzanine have been accused of using a variety of methods to ramp up stock prices to artificially high values so insiders can rake in profits.

These include entering into apparently bogus business deals, setting up sham firms and sending out false and misleading press releases about the prospects of companies.

Apart from allegations of share ramping, one of the companies linked with Mezzanine, Atlanta-based franchise firm Uniforms for America, has been accused by several US franchise holders of defrauding them by taking their $25,000 franchise fee and then offering no support.

One of the most damning allegations uncovered in our investigation involves a company whose stock is traded by Mezzanine, California-based XtraNet Systems, whose management includes Bronk and fellow Mezzanine Capital director Gary Davies.

An officer of XtraNet has been accused of physically stealing the financial statements of a Nevis-based Internet credit card processing company called DataBank International from its fax machine last month and then releasing them as XtraNet's a few days later, sending its stock price and trading volume soaring.

Shortly after releasing the allegedly stolen results over the Internet, XtraNet's stock went from about 16 cents per share to nearly $4 over a two week period before slipping back again to about $1.50. Trading volume, which had been almost non-existent, shot up considerably, with the biggest dump off occurring on February 1, when 1.8 million shares were sold.

Incredibly, XtraNet is currently featured as the 'Stock of the Month' for February by a promoter operating from www.hotstocknews.com, whose glowing review of XtraNet - for which it admits it was paid in shares - was largely based on XtraNet’s allegedly bogus financials.

XtraNet had indeed been negotiating to merge with the Nevis company and put out several press releases last summer announcing the deal.

However, after the deal was effectively called off in August, 1998 because the Nevis company's principal became suspicious of Bronk, XtraNet never announced the deal was off and, instead, put out a misleading press release creating the impression that it had gone through smoothly. To this day, Mezzanine's web-site at www.mezz.com still contains press releases that create the impression the deal went through.

Mezzanine Capital is a closed-end investment fund that was listed on the Bermuda Stock Exchange in the first quarter of 1995 before the current BSX regulations were in place. Its bankers are the Bank of Bermuda in Bermuda and its legal advisors are Conyers, Dill & Pearman.

The company was introduced to Bermuda by CD&P, which also represented another BSX-listed company, NimsTec, that was delisted in 1997 after we exposed its misleading and inaccurate share prospectus.

Indeed, Graham Collis, a senior partner of CD&P, helped prepare the share prospectuses for both NimsTec and Mezzanine Capital.

Although registered in Bermuda, Mezzanine is run by a group of businessmen operating out of California and Arizona and has 112 different shareholders from several countries, including the United States, Canada, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the Turks & Caicos Islands, Panama, Ireland, South Africa and Israel.

The company's President and Chairman is Eric Chess Bronk, of Irvine, California. Other directors are Joseph R. Glenn (Vice President), of Phoenix, Arizona; Mitchell A. Saltz, Gary Davies and Sloan B. Jones, all of Scottsdale, Arizona; Carl T. Suter, of Anaheim, California; CD&P subsidiary Codan Services Ltd. (Resident Representative) and Bermuda-based CD&P attorney Wayne Morgan (Assistant Secretary).

Mezzanine's shares have never traded on the BSX. The company posts a net asset value each week that can be determined solely on the whim of its directors, according to the company's share prospectus. It appears that this NAV has deviated little from its original $10 per share, even though the stock in which it invests fluctuates wildly.

Mezzanine essentially sells its stock to a handful of microcap companies traded on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market so that it shows up as assets on these companies' books and enhances solvency. In return, Mezzanine usually receives stock in these companies, which it then trades in the marketplace, or pays cash for Regulation ‘S’ securities.

Although the Bermuda firm of Arthur Morris & Co. appears as Mezzanine's accountants on its prospectus, the company's accounts are done by Utah-based Schvaneveldt & Co., whose boss declined to comment for this story, as did all of the parties being investigated.

Mezzanine's financial statements sometimes contain remarkable items. For example, a Note to Mezzanine's fiscal 1997 financials stated: "In the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to acquire German Bearer Bonds that they valued at $10,099,306. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996, it was discovered that there was no established quantifiable redemption value for the Bonds. The Company responded to this discovery by taking a temporary write down of $10,099,206. The Bearer Bonds are listed as an asset of $100. The Company is seeking a private placement to sell the Bonds."

Since Mezzanine never pays dividends to its shareholders and its shareholders are not entitled to redeem their shares, according to its prospectus, its very existence seems to be to provide 'assets' to highly dubious companies, some of which have close links to Mezzanine's officers and shareholders.

Mezzanine's officers appear to manage companies whose shares are traded by Mezzanine and some of Mezzanine's shareholders also receive commissions and fees through entering into seemingly dubious business transactions, some of which are currently being litigated following disputes alleging fraud.

Mezzanine has or has had positions in the following US-based companies: XtraNet Systems, The Hartcourt Companies, Uniforms for America, Conectisys Corp., Phone Time Resources (now Global Access Pagers), Beverage Store Inc. (now Fortune Oil & Gas), Net Voice Technologies, Paystar Communications and Hycroft Environmental Corporation (of which we can find no trace). The stock of all but the one we could not locatefluctuates between a few cents and a few dollars, while each firm continually loses money.

All of the companies have an appalling track record.

Conectisys Corp. was found guilty by the SEC five months ago of participating in a stock manipulation scheme, although neither Mezzanine nor any of its known associates were parties to the action.

On September 22, 1998, Conectisys Corp. was ordered by the US District Court for the Central District Court of California to "disgorge $175,000 of proceeds derived from its fraudulent conduct", according to an SEC press release.

In related judgments against Andrew S. Pitt, Devon Investment Advisors Inc., Mike Zaman, B&M Capital Corp. and Smith Benton & Hughes, the defendants were ordered to disgorge a total of $1.06 million they had made from manipulating Conectisys stock.

"Based on the evidence presented at the trial, the court found that Pitt and Zaman together planned the manipulation of Conectisys stock and Zaman and Smith Benton carried out that manipulation with Pitt's assistance," stated an SEC press release.

"In the course of carrying out the manipulation, Zaman and Smith Benton controlled the number of Conectisys common shares available for sale on the market, dictated the prices at which those shares traded, engaged in 'daisy chain' trading with market participants to fill retail customer orders and artificially increased the price of the stock purchased by retail customers.

"The court also found that Pitt and Conectisys offered and sold restricted stock to private investors based on material misrepresentations and that Pitt and Conectisys drafted a false and misleading business plan that was supplied to potential investors.

"Finally, the court found that Pitt, Conectisys and Devon sold unregistered securities in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act."

Conectisys, which has Mezzanine shareholder Mandarin Overseas Investment Company as a holder of more than five per cent of its stock, reported a net loss of $2.7 million for fiscal 1997.

Accounting firm BDO Seidman, which took over the audit of Conectisys in 1996 after the company dismissed its previous auditors over "disagreements", said net deficiencies in the company's working capital of $1.24 million and $780,357 at November 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively, raised "substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern".

Despite the 1997 loss, the annual salary of its President, Robert Spigno, was increased to $160,000, while his wife, Patricia, received $80,000. All three senior officers, including the Spignos, also received a 'Staying Bonus' equivalent to 50 per cent of their annual salary, payable in restricted common stock, and each had options to buy 500,000 shares at "50 per cent of the average market value in the 30 days prior to it happening", according to documents filed with the SEC.

Another company closely-linked with Mezzanine, called The Hartcourt Companies, also featured on the periphery of a current investigation by the SEC into alleged stock manipulation by stock promoter Investor's Edge, although Hartcourt has not been officially implicated.

Investor's Edge has been accused by the SEC of being paid to write glowing reviews of stock that were presented to investors as impartial recommendations.

Investor's Edge recommended Hartcourt as a "strong buy" when its stock was at $1.40 but it has plummeted to 32 cents. Hartcourt's President Alan Viet Phan, who was interviewed as part of the Investor's Edge promotion, claims the promoter asked him for money but he refused to pay.

The Hartcourt Companies started an Investor's Bulletin Board for its stock last month but it was quickly taken down after a flood of negative messages from investors, some of whom claimed they had been ripped off.

Hartcourt's President Alan Phan, whose name has appeared as a director of another Mezzanine-related company called Uniforms for America, told us the bulletin board was taken down not because of the negative postings but because "someone planted a virus" and he said it would be back up again soon.

Despite the company's history of losses, Phan declared to investors that some of America's greatest companies were criticized by investors in their early days and he even likened himself to Microsoft's Bill Gates.

Hartcourt is currently suing two of Mezzanine's shareholders, Turks & Caicos Islands-registered Promed International and Mandarin Overseas Investment Company Ltd., claiming Hartcourt was defrauded in a deal to sell it 34 Alaskan gold-mines.

Hartcourt, which paid an up-front fee comprising 1.3 million Regulation 'S' Securities for the mines, reversed the deal when the defendants allegedly failed to provide a geological evaluation showing the mines were worth at least $10 million, as promised.

Hartcourt, which reported a loss of $1.6 million in 1996 and a loss of $474,372 for 1997 - $135,000 of which was due to the company issuing preferred stock dividends - now wants its shares back from Mandarin and Promed.

In another case, Eric Bronk and one of Mezzanine's other shareholders, Pagestar Inc., which appears to be operated out of Mezzanine's and Bronk's office in California, are co-defendants in a class action lawsuit filed in California on May 12, 1998 in which they are accused of stock manipulation.

Plaintiff Joseph A. Nigro claims he was conned into investing about $40,000 worth of shares in Satellite Technologies Corp. and the company it merged into, Pagestar Inc., based on false press releases about the firm's capabilities. The company's stock went as high as $3.75 based on hype but had plummeted to seven cents by September, 1997 when the alleged fraud was uncovered, states the complaint.

The statement of claim alleges that Bronk and the other individual co-defendants misled Nigro so they could "sell their own shares in the companies…and to indirectly benefit themselves by securing additional capital to pay their own salaries and bonuses as directors, employees and/or officers of the companies."

Spigno, whose attorneys are seeking between $2 million and $3 million, claims that Pagestar was nothing more than a shell company with no bona fide operations, a similar claim that has been leveled at XtraNet Systems.

There is similar discontent among investors in Uniforms for America, which sells franchises that supply medical and career uniforms.

In an investment package sent out by the company two months ago, there was a report dated August 12, 1997 by CSK Securities Research of California forecasting Uniforms for America stock price would be "in the $10 to $12 range in 1998 and in the $15 to $20 range in 1999". The reality is that, at February 25, 1999, Uniforms for America stock was trading for 56 cents.

Our research showed that CSK Securities is a business run from the home of Christina and Neal Kohlhaas, who started the company five years after being declared bankrupt in San Diego.

Uniforms for America, whose President is James D. Brockman, is facing another crisis at the moment and the possibility of a class action lawsuit from franchise holders who claim they have been defrauded.

Several of the 50 existing franchise holders in the US claim they paid up to $25,000 each for franchises but have received little or no support by the firm, as promised in contracts.

Apart from their franchise fee, some franchise holders told us they had paid Uniforms for America for merchandise but the company had failed to pay the manufacturers, who in turn eventually stopped delivering clothes to stores. One manufacturer was owed in the region of $1 million, according to one franchise holder.

It has also been claimed that Uniforms for America, which we have been told holds the leases on store properties, had failed to pay the rent to some landlords even though franchise holders had paid the rent to Uniforms for America, leading to problems for some franchise holders.

Additionally, it was claimed that Uniforms for America has tried to force some of the more successful franchise holders out of business so the corporation could take over their stores.

James Brockman failed to return a message from this newsletter.

Interestingly, Uniforms for America also holds stock in the Hartcourt Companies and Phone Time Resources, two of the half dozen or so companies Mezzanine has links with. Additionally, Hartcourt's President, Alan Phan, was listed as a director of Uniforms for America last year, although he denied to us he had been a director.

Further evidence that there might be a widespread conspiracy to defraud investors is provided by the fact that Regis Possino, a disbarred California attorney who runs Phone Time Resources, has also been involved with Hartcourt, as its corporate counsel (AFTER he was disbarred) and as an 'investment advisor' and is also a behind the scenes figure at Uniforms for America.

Possino's name appears in so many businesses linked with Mezzanine that it raises the question of whether he might be a hidden shareholder in the company.

Apart from disbarment in 1984, Possino's history includes being imprisoned for one year in 1978 for trying to sell $38,500 worth of marijuana to undercover Los Angeles cops, trying to place a monthly order for $680,000 worth of cocaine with the same officers, attempting to sell $5 million of stolen US treasury bills or bearer bonds to an undercover treasury agent, undergoing a $12 million personal bankruptcy and interfering with a witness at his trial on the marijuana offence, leading to her dismissal from the jury and his imprisonment for the rest of his trial.

"One evening during the trial, petitioner encountered one of the trial jurors as she was waiting for a table at a restaurant," reads the official record of his appeal against disbarment.

"He approached her, initiated a conversation and bought drinks for her and her companions. Although they did not discuss the merits of the case, petitioner asked the juror what she thought of the prosecutor. He also talked to her about himself, other persons involved in the trial and the judge. Learning that the juror was a religious person, petitioner discussed his own religious beliefs with her. The conversation ended when the juror and her friends were called to dinner."

Details of all of the above, with the exception of his bankruptcy, which was closed in 1992 with assets of $229,000 and liabilities of $12.18 million, were presented to the California Bar Association at his appeal against disbarment.

Although Possino's appeal against disbarment was thrown out, three of the eight members of the panel voted against disbarment and thought his licence should only be suspended for five years!

The involvement of so many businessmen with dubious pasts contradicts a claim by Mezzanine President Eric Bronk in the company's 1997 annual return with the Bermuda Stock Exchange that Mezzanine invests in companies with "strong management".

Bronk declined to discuss a list of questions we sent to him. "It appears clear that if you were interested in doing a fair article on Mezzanine Capital that you would not have waited until less than 48 hours before your publication to make any inquiries," he wrote by e-mail.

"Suffice to say that neither your questions nor the quality of your newsletter appear to merit serious or detailed response.

"Mezzanine Capital invests in emerging microcap public companies whose stock price can, by their very nature, be volatile. In the companies in which it invests, Mezzanine Capital takes only a minority position, usually less than ten per cent, and certainly has no input into the management or promotion of the companies". The last part of the sentence, however, is clearly false. In a document Mezzanine filed with the Bermuda Stock Exchange, Bronk and fellow Mezzanine director Gary Davies are listed as part of the 'Management' of XtraNet Systems.

Bronk is also listed as the Chief Financial Officer of XtraNet and Davies as one of its directors in official XtraNet documents and the telephone and fax numbers used for Mezzanine are not only the same as XtraNet's but also that of Net Voice Technologies, both companies Mezzanine holds or has held stock positions in.

Bronk, who is a licensed California attorney, has a colorful past. In 1991, he paid $1.1 million to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to settle an investigation into his role in a failed savings and loan institution in which regulators suspected fraud and embezzlement.

Additionally, Bronk and two of his companies were ordered to hand over an unspecified sum of money that was in a bank account in Los Angeles. Despite the settlement, Bronk denied any wrongdoing.

Our research shows that he has been a defendant in nine lawsuits filed at California State Court and there have been four judgments against him. Several of the cases involve allegations of dishonesty.

We have handed over details of our research to the SEC.



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)5/2/2002 5:43:11 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, WILL U.S. BROKER DEALER DONNER END UP LIKE CHRISTINA? WHY IS THIS BROKER DEALER ALLOWED TO DO THE SAME THINK AS CHRISTINA AND GET AWAY WITH IT? THE NASDAQ JUST KEEPS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY!! WHY DOES DONNER WHO RECOMMENDED AND RE-RECOMMENDED XYBR GET A SILK PURSE AND CHRISTINA GETS THE SOWS EAR?

Silk purse in penny stocks

A tout makes money even as his clients’ shares collapse

By Bruce Kelly
Tech stocks have been decimated by the market downturn, but Jeff
Baclet has kept the faith.
After all, he’s paid by companies that have slipped so far in value that
they’ve fallen into the
netherworld of penny stocks.
Selling for less than $5 a share, they dwell in the low-rent district of
the Nasdaq’s Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets — thinly traded, rarely followed by
analysts, little known to
investors and subject to wild bursts of volatility.
That’s where Mr. Baclet, 31, comes in.
Using a mix of Bible-thumping zeal and unrelenting optimism, he hypes
a stable of companies for a
fee through Donner Corp. International. He founded the Santa Ana,
Calif., broker-dealer after a
peripatetic career on the fringes of the financial services industry.
“It’s like a public relations firm,” says David E. Rubbins, a New York
securities lawyer.
“The SEC would likely look hard at this kind of arrangement,” adds
Barry Barbash, a partner in
Washington with Shearman & Sterling who once ran the Securities
and Exchange Commission’s
division of investment management.
FULL DISCLOSURE
That arrangement is strictly cash, carry and buyer beware.
Given the precipitous decline of the Nasdaq Composite Index since its
peak last year, the OTC
market has become the elephant’s graveyard of dozens of
once-highflying tech companies. Many
are willing to shell out big bucks to try to regain some of the glory of
the tech boom.
Donner is one of about 200 firms that bottom-feed on the hopes and
dreams of wannabe moguls,
according to Key Ramsey, chief executive of Knobias.com, a website
he started after being
victimized in a penny stock scam. He follows 6,300 micro-cap
companies trading publicly on the
Nasdaq Small-Cap market and the Pink Sheets.
He says that Mr. Baclet and other brokers who tout penny stocks for
a fee are taking advantage of a
legal loophole to pump the price of a stock.
“Regulators we’ve talked to wish this would go away,” says Mr.
Ramsey.
GOD AND MONEY
Mr. Baclet, however, is unlikely to disappear anytime soon. He
opened the doors of his
broker-dealer in 1996, and he has never run afoul of Securities and
Exchange Commission
regulations, according to the federal agency.
However, some of the seven securities firms, one insurance company
and two realty firms he
worked for between 1989 and 1996 have.
Capital International Securities Group Inc. of Boca Raton, Fla., the
last company he worked for
before opening Donner, was hit with a class action in 1999 for
allegedly defrauding investors in a
pump-and-dump stock scheme that ran from August 1997 to August
1999.
Another of Mr. Baclet’s former Florida employers, GKN Securities
Corp., was ordered in 1997 to pay
$2.1 million in fines and restitution, according to NASD Regulation
Inc., the independent
enforcement arm of the National Association of Securities Dealers.
Between December 1993 and April 1996, the firm and 29 brokers
and supervisors allegedly
controlled the immediate after-market trading in eight stocks it
underwrote, and excessively inflated
those prices, according to the NASDR.
Mr. Baclet worked for Capital International Securities from July 1995
to December 1996 and GKN
Securities from August to November 1994. He was not named as a
defendant in the class action
against Capital International Securities, nor did the NASD name or
fine him for a role in the GKN
Securities case.
As well as pumping the hopes and dreams of penny stock moguls,
Mr. Baclet mixes Christian
evangelism with his investment advice.
His website, for example, provides a biblical justification to shun
trading on margin and gives
in-vestors an opportunity to donate to a fundamentalist Christian
charity that rails against Hollywood,
porn-ography and homosexuals.
SLIDING SCALE
For companies that pay a one-time fee, ranging between $3,000 and
$7,000, Donner publishes
press releases and “research reports” touting its penny stocks.
The higher Mr. Baclet can drive the stock, the greater the reward,
which can include stock options,
monthly retainers and fees that typically rise on a sliding scale along
with the stock price.
Mr. Baclet is quick to point out that his fee arrangements are fully
disclosed in accordance with SEC
rules.
“It’s clear it’s a fee-paid [service],” he says.
However, the information has a habit of finding its way into investor
chat rooms or onto computer
bulletin boards, where the disclaimer is sometimes not mentioned or
has been deleted.
In the case of Tickets.com Inc. (TIXX), an online ticket service,
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter analysts
gushed about the Costa Mesa, Calif., company when it handled the
initial public offering Nov. 4,
1999. The stock jumped to $32 a share, from an IPO price of $12.50,
before closing that day at
$19.25 a share.
Thursday the stock closed at 39 cents a share, and the Nasdaq says
the company is in line to be
taken off the exchange for failing to meet minimum listing
requirements.
Tickets.com was caught in last year’s tech-stock riptide and has
traded below $1 since November.
Donner took the company on as a client in December after the NASD
warned Tickets.com for the
first time that it was in danger of being delisted.
On Jan. 22, Donner issued a press release that glowingly described
the company’s prospects.
Donner’s research report on Tickets.com didn’t include a projection of
the company’s future earnings
on its cover or on any of its pages. Such projections are standard
fare for analysts’ reports.
The report does include, however, a quote from the Book of
Jeremiah.
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; before you were born I
sanctified you,” reads the
quote, which appears under a box listing Tickets.com’s revenue.
The report gave the stock a “speculative buy” rating.
According to ratings group First Call Corp., a “speculative buy” rating
falls between a rating of “buy”
and “hold” and means a stock has more risk.
“We believe Tickets.com is highly undervalued considering it is moving
forward with a business plan
to revolutionize the online ticketing industry,” Donner wrote.
But in its annual report this month, Tickets.com warned investors that
it soon might cease to exist.
“If we are unable to obtain additional funding on satisfactory terms in
the near future, we’ll have to
modify our business plan, reduce or discontinue some or all of our
operations, seek a buyer for
substantially all of our assets or seek bankruptcy protection,” the
company cautioned.
Even so, Donner’s January press release caused a stir among
investors in chat rooms on Yahoo!
Inc.’s financial website.
A VOLATILE SWING
The morning the press re-lease was published by an online news
service, one stock jockey,
Mtanda_ 2000, copied it in full, without the disclaimer, in a message
with the subject as “good buy
recommendation.” The identity of the writer could not be learned.
Over three days, Jan. 19, 22 and 23, Tickets.com saw its volume
surge, respectively, from 374,000
shares, to 829,000 shares, to 2.2 million shares. The price climbed to
84 cents over that time, from
50 cents.
The next day, both the volume and price fell back — to 925,000 and
78 cents.
“Like a lot of penny stocks, it fluctuates quite a lot,” says David
Kathman, a stock analyst who has
watched, but not formally covered, Tickets.com for Morningstar.com.
Donner would have benefited greatly from any strong move in the
stock price, according to the
release. It said Tickets.com was to pay Donner 1,000 shares of
stock for its work.
If the stock had closed at $10, $15, $20 or $25, Donner stood to
receive an additional 1,000 shares
of stock for reaching each plateau.
In another release, Donner disclosed that it would receive $7,000,
plus a $2,500 monthly retainer.
But in its research report, it says merely that it received a $5,250 due
diligence fee and a $6,000
retainer. The report also made no mention of shares potentially owed
to Donner.
“They’re following the letter of the law, but not the spirit,” says Mr.
Kathman.
BULLISH
Mr. Baclet says that in all but one of the sectors it covers, his team
has no specialists. He says, “It’s
a team effort when we go into a project.”
He likens his practice of taking a fee to cover companies with market
caps barely in the millions to
Wall Street’s practice of refusing to write “sell” recommendations of
companies worth billions.
Indeed, once a business has signed up with Mr. Baclet, it is just about
guaranteed to get a bullish
rating.
Donner has pulled at least one company from the list — Far East
Adventures, a phone card
company that Mr. Baclet says didn’t give his analysts correct financial
information.
Since March 6, 2000, Donner has produced at least 104 favorable
press releases and not one “hold”
or “sell” rating, according to a search of Dow Jones Interactive.
In that time, the Nasdaq Composite Index has fallen more than 60%,
and all 18 companies that
Donner lists as clients on its website have seen their prices tank.
Mr. Baclet says huge swings in stock price are part of investing in
penny stocks, and he insists that
he is not a stock touter. In fact, in the past, his clients have been
winners, he says.



To: Roy F who wrote (4865)5/2/2002 6:25:42 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6847
 
ROY, When man looks into the abyss and nothing is staring back, that is when man finds his true character.