SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2850)4/23/2002 12:14:36 PM
From: Bear Down  Respond to of 12468
 
I would like to attend the auction for that siezure



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (2850)4/24/2002 1:25:57 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12468
 
Stock promoter bashing the SEC over freedom of speech

westergaard.com The full site isn't up yet but I have some parts of it here which he is sending to people mary.cc

Westergaard believes that the SEC has violated his freedom of speech by not allowing him to tout stock scams and loser stocks like PLSIA, ASTN, UMCC... Imagine that. He believes his "cyberstations" i.e. paid company profiles, were expressions of his freedom of speech as an individual and a publisher. He believes that the SEC had a thing for him and just wanted to bankrupt a poor old dying man. No mention yet of him being sued for not having a disclaimer and for making impossible projections. Notice that most of his touts are bankrupt. I think he touted Edgar's for free just to try to look legit. Use the way back machine web.archive.org to see his missing disclaimer. He also used to have the Wall Street Journal ads on his site to look legit besides news feeds from legit sources to try and make him seem credible.

Here is a pic of him that he will be showing on his site
westergaard.com

and this is what he really looks like. This is 2-3 years old.
mary.cc

If we have the right to say a stock sucks, he has the right to say it's great. When does freedom of speech become securities fraud?