SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (50413)4/23/2002 1:13:51 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Hewlett blasts HP-Compaq integration

By Larry Dignan
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
April 23, 2002, 9:10 AM PT

WILMINGTON, Del.--Opening arguments began here Tuesday in the Hewlett vs. HP trial, with the lawyer for dissident shareholder Walter Hewlett displaying a host of internal e-mails contending that the proposed merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq Computer was having integration troubles.

Stephen Neal, of the law firm Cooley Godward, cited e-mails from the HP-Compaq "value creation team" showing the companies would be unable to hit targets outlined in an S4 document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission filed in February.

Neal also cited e-mails from Compaq Chief Financial Officer Jeff Clarke and CEO Michael Capellas indicating that initial plans from the business units were low. Feedback to one e-mail from Clarke showed the companies had a "mile to go." In addition, Neal cited personal journal entries from Capellas questioning whether the companies could meet their goals.



But HP attorney Steven Schatz said Hewlett, son of the Palo Alto, Calif., company's co-founder, presented only half the picture, arguing that business units in the value creation team intentionally set low goals. He added that Hewlett's claim had no basis and that further testimony would prove him wrong.

HP CEO Carly Fiorina, CFO Robert Wayman and Walter Hewlett were in attendance at the court.

The proceedings kicked off a three-day trial that could help decide the fate of the $20 billion merger. Hewlett filed a lawsuit asking the Delaware Chancery Court to overturn the vote by HP shareholders to approve the deal.

Leading up to the trial, both HP and Hewlett have been mum about their respective strategies. The parties have exchanged requests and have agreed to limit disclosure to the public but allow federal regulators to examine the documents.

The trial is the latest effort by Hewlett to derail the deal. Hewlett is arguing that HP improperly influenced Deutsche Bank to vote its shares for the deal. He is asking the court to throw out Deutsche Bank's votes or seek a new vote as an alternative.

HP said last week that its tally shows the company received the required votes from shareholders, but Hewlett is asking for a recount and may challenge some ballots.

All the wrangling has delayed HP's integration plans. HP had hoped to close the Compaq deal on April 1, but the company said a recount has pushed things out until early May. Nevertheless, the companies have said they are forging ahead with integration plans.