To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2879 ) 4/24/2002 7:33:24 AM From: JSLyons Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95444 Hi Don, One of the difficulties for the market these days, in my opinion, is the emergence of new leaders -- or new trends within traditional leaders -- in the so-called tech market. A review of recent results and CCs show most of the action is in the small but crucial leading edge, which often makes up only a fraction of an established company's activities. Yet, it is these established companies that get most of the attention and attract the big investment dollars. Such companies as KLIC and EMLX demonstrate this quite clearly. Scott Kulicke was adamant: cutting-edge foundries are at or near 100% capacity, while KLIC's broader customer base is only in the 60% range. As a result, orders were strong for the new MAXUM bonder that can handle extreme design features; the older bonder it replaces is being sold at firesale prices. EMLX's report says customers are skipping the current generation of technology and putting capex only into next-generation gear. So far, the demand for the high-end remains limited. But profit margins are often highest in this segment and it provides some road map to the future, as today's high end becomes tomorrow's established technology. As Cary will tell you, ALTR cited margins in the 60% range and said they will improve further for its line of fancy programmable chips. Your basic DRAM-maker can only dream of such numbers. Traditional metrics like the SOX reflect traditional "tech" companies, many of which will benefit only from large-scale capacity buys and general economic growth. MU's deal for Hynix may make it the world's biggest maker of DRAMs, but so what? A commodity is a commodity is a commodity. Turn on the TV or open the financial pages of a newspaper and we see the same, tired names. In this universe, "tech" has become a proxy for the economy in general. I suggest that by returning to the promise of technology investing, that is, by hunting down emerging technologies that are the "must haves" of the new decade, not the "had to haves" of the 1990s, there is still money to be made even in these tough times. The current malaise will continue until a new order begins to emerge within the test sector. My own basket of smaller tech firms, none of which are in the SOX, is far stronger than the SOX, the NAZ or other major indices would have you believe. A few to look at: ASYT, AXTI, EMKR, GGNS, TRKN, KLIC, MKSI, ATMI, ALTR. Good luck all. Jonathan