Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Silver prices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (4947)	4/24/2002 10:09:02 AM
From: Little Joe	Respond to of 8010

Wayne: The reason for the rise is prices is seldom revealed until the move is well underway. Trust the charts. Little joe

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (4947)	4/24/2002 11:23:44 AM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8010

Here's another one for you: Noranda mined 3.65moz of AG for Q1-02 versus 3.2moz for Q4-02 versus 2.1moz for Q1-2001 newswire.ca

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (4947)	4/25/2002 9:33:18 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8010

Looks like I'm going to continue disagree with the Silver Institute (again) who thinks the gap is going to be 100moz in 2002, because more quarterly production reports keep coming out. BHP Billiton reported 11.073moz of Q1-02 silver production, which is up 20% from Q4-01 (9.209moz), and up 62% from Q1-01 (6.824moz) At this rate, they could produce as much as 44moz in 2002 versus 33moz in 2001, 11moz is a substantial amount. This continues to lead me to conclude the gap with shrink to maybe 50moz or less in 2002 and we might be in surplus in a few years. REF: bhpbilliton.com