To: gold$10k who wrote (11040 ) 4/24/2002 11:31:46 AM From: kirby49 Respond to of 36161 VT: Snippets from the link in Slider's last post.``Even though it has done well lately, I still don't see a great role for gold in a portfolio,'' says Morningstar's Christopher Davis, pointing out that efforts to time the market usually backfire, while even long-term investors have met with severe losses. He thinks better ways exist to protect against inflation and hedge investments -- the traditional reason for buying a gold fund. He doesn't say what the better ways are<GG>, but he's missing the point as timing is everything, although the emphasis should be on timing the exit and the media places the emphasis on timing the entrance. Russ has shown us the way for his style of playing the markets. Doubles and triples are being taken off the table, while these guys still look for entries.Indeed, many precious-metals fund managers and analysts still say the primary motivation for buying a gold fund is as a defensive play. Fund managers are optimistic that gold will climb to $350 or even $400 an ounce over the next year, but they warn that at its current $300, climbing higher will be a tough slog in the near term. These guys are incompetent or lying. If they're short bullion and saying this, they're lying while buying rising mining shares, otherwise they're incompetent for not knowing individual equities in funds can rise while POG hangs in there because others are lying.<LOL> Either way they are totally wrong about defensive plays and again Russ' 10 month plays were offensive, beautiful, thoughtful plays, and I don't think he's done yet! As long as this is what they're telling JQP I'm hoping for it to be a quiet continual up until they tell JQP that now is the time for them to buy now. Of course that's when I'll be looking for the exits. Regards Bob