Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : HWP -- Hewlett Packard -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave B who wrote (4564)	4/24/2002 12:37:47 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4722

Apr 24, 2002 (Daily News - Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News via COMTEX) -- Walter Hewlett began his last-ditch effort to derail the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq yesterday, presenting a Delaware court with documents meant to show company execs knowingly fleeced investors. It was the first day of what's expected to be a contentious three-day trial. The outcome will decide the fate of the biggest technology merger in history. Hewlett, who filed the lawsuit 10 days after H-P shareholders approved the merger by a hair's-breadth, is attempting to force a new vote by proving H-P and Compaq managers oversold the benefits of their $19.4 billion deal and used company contracts to "entice and coerce" votes in their favor. The first blockbuster evidence was a February or early-March diary entry by Compaq CEO Michael Capellas. "Sobering thought," the entry read, "at our course and speed, we will fail." Under a four-hour grilling by Hewlett's lawyers, H-P CEO Carly Fiorina acknowledged that different documents from last month stated post-merger profit targets would be nearly 25 percent lower than publicly touted. She also conceded the new numbers were never disclosed to H-P's board. Still, she argued her actions were not improper, citing other reports the deal remained well on track. Changing gears to focus on the vote-buying accusation, Hewlett's lawyers accused H-P managers of concealing a $1 million bonus to Deutsche Bank that allegedly was used to buy 17 million last-minute votes. The Justice Department also is investigating H-P's efforts to secure votes. Legal experts suggested Hewlett's team began with questions surrounding H-P's disclosure record before moving on to the alleged vote-buying because the 17 million votes in question won't tip the balance. Independent inspectors have said H-P's victory margin was 45 million. "A 17-million vote purchase probably wouldn't cause me to invalidate a decision that 51 percent of the shareholders voted for," said Columbia University law professor John Coffee. "Courts in general prefer to let elections get decided in the market." Still, the judge in the case, William Chandler 3d, "has a wide range of remedies at his disposal," said Charles Elson, director of the Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. "I think he'll look at the [disclosure and vote-buying] claims separately. But he could also combine the two, arguing that improperly cast votes should have been disclosed." By Nancy Dillon To see more of the Daily News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to nydailynews.com (c) 2002, Daily News, New York. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.