Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Hydro One - IPO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Sladek who wrote (14)	4/24/2002 4:15:48 PM
From: John Sladek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52

April 23, 2002 - Government denies planned Hydro One sale Tory attempt to deal with deficit TORONTO (CP) -- Ontario's opposition parties kept up their attack Tuesday on the government's $5-billion plan to sell off the province's electricity grid, with the Liberals accusing the Tories of attempting a quick cash-grab. The attacks came after Premier Ernie Eves indicated he would rewrite legislation to deal with a court ruling that the government has no authority to privatize Hydro One. "The Tories, our managers, are facing a budget deficit (and) manager Eves knows that running a deficit is going to make him look silly," Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty said. "So he's going to do what bad managers always do when their mistakes leave them short of cash: sell something quickly to make the books look a little better." Finance Minister Janet Ecker, speaking for the government, denied that money raised by the sale of Hydro One, a successor company of the former debt-laden Ontario Hydro, will go into general revenues. "The commitment that has been made is that the net proceeds that are realized from the sale of Hydro One will be used to help pay down (Ontario Hydro's) debt and all proceeds will stay within the electricity sector," Ecker said. But McGuinty said the government "is being dishonest" about its plans for the money and also questioned Eves' sincerity about holding public hearings on the sale. Eves said late Tuesday he would be open to the idea of hearings and would "probably" recommend changing the Electricity Act rather than appealing the Superior Court ruling. "The legislature is going to have to address the shortcoming that the judge found," Eves said. "If that's the case, then I don't see any harm in having the public comment." The NDP accused the Conservative government of ignoring public sentiment but also accused the Liberals party of flip-flopping on the issue. NDP Leader Howard Hampton produced poll results from the Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey riding where Eves is running in a byelection that suggest strong opposition to both the privatization and deregulation of Ontario's electricity sector. "This is an issue that is so significant for people across Ontario, not just in the short term but in the long term, that it's a decision that only can be made by the people of Ontario," Hampton said. "The only public consultation that will suffice is an election." At the same time, he said he wasn't surprised that the government has yet to respond to the court ruling that has put the brakes on the sell-off. "The government strategy with respect to hydro privatization is to say as little as possible, to try to keep this issue submerged as much as possible," Hampton said. He also quoted McGuinty as saying in December that privatizing Hydro One was the right move. "What exactly is the Liberal position? Because it seems to be shifting," Hampton said. McGuinty denied any change in position, saying he has always opposed selling the power grid. canoe.ca

To: John Sladek who wrote (14)	4/24/2002 4:21:06 PM
From: John Sladek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52

20-APr-2002 - Decision will spook investors: consultant 'Another speed bump' Paul Vieira Financial Post Glenn Lowson, National Post Eleanor Clitheroe, chief executive of Hydro One, has seen her plans to oversee the privatization of the utility blocked by a court ruling. Yesterday's court ruling temporarily halting the privatization of Hydro One Inc. may initially deter other companies -- namely power generators -- from investing in the province's $10-billion electricity sector, industry observers warn. "This will spook investors to some extent," said Jan Carr, managing partner of Barker Dunn & Rossi, a power industry consultancy. "This is another speed bump, and each one has dulled the interest of investors of doing business here in Ontario." Tom Adams, executive director of Energy Probe, a watchdog for the industry, believes this latest setback is devastating. "You can hear the sound of money moving out of the province," he said. "This is disruptive. It's just another reason for investors to stay away from the province." Mr. Justice Arthur Gans of the Ontario Superior Court ruled yesterday the province lacked the legal authority to sell Hydro One in an initial public offering. The privatization of Hydro One was one of the key elements of the province's move to restructure its electricity industry. Ontario prepared for deregulation by splitting the old Ontario Hydro monopoly into five pieces -- the most important two elements being Hydro One and Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG), the monopoly electricity producer which must reduce its control of the province's power supply from nearly 80% to 35% by 2012. In two separate announcements in December, the government said it would sell Hydro One and open its market on May 1. Starting on that day, businesses and households are free to buy their power from whomever they chose. The government hopes this will spur competition and lead to lower hydro rates. It is contingent on power producers coming into Ontario to build plants and compete with OPG. Several big-name companies, such as TransAlta Corp., ATCO Power and Sithe Energies Inc. of New York, are, or have, committed to build multi-billion-dollar projects in the province. And others are looking to buy existing power plants. Boralex Inc. of Montreal says it wants to expand in the Ontario market, while Brascan Corp. recently paid OPG $350-million to buy a hydroelectric facility near Sault Ste. Marie, Duane Cramer, a vice-president for Sithe, which has two projects underway in suburban Toronto, said yesterday the Hydro One ruling will have little impact on his company's strategy, because it is interested in power generation, while Hydro One is a pure transmitter. "Our investments were never dependent on who owned Hydro One," Mr. Cramer said. Before the government decided to privatize Hydro One, there was talk of turning the transmitter into a not-for-profit company. That idea drew sharp criticism from some prominent power executives -- most notably Stephen Snyder of TransAlta. Mr. Snyder, whose company is building a $450-million power plant near Sarnia, Ont., warned he would not invest another dollar in the province unless the government cleared up the rules surrounding deregulation and the status of Hydro One. A couple of weeks following his warning, the Ontario government announced the Hydro One sale and the opening of the market. Mr. Snyder declined to comment yesterday about the latest Hydro One development. Mr. Carr, the consultant, was optimistic confidence can be restored, as long as the government deals quickly with the ruling -- either with an appeal or passing new law giving it authority to sell the transmitter. "We need to get on with it and do it expeditiously." pvieira@nationalpost.com nationalpost.com