Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (10604)	4/24/2002 7:14:29 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I feel the debate would be illuminated by your making clear (illumining, shall we say) precisely what acts you would allow without advocating the homosexual be subjected to the misery of social opprobrium. You don't want that clear. You prefer to keep it vague, to not pin it down to what human beings are being forbidden or allowed to do in your idioverse, on pain of opprobrium. I hope next time you advocate opprobrium you will think "For what, precisely? What would I approve, precisely? What would I disapprove, precisely?" If there are to be penalties, the crime must be spelled out. Maybe after you've thought about it, you can spell it out.