Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (36840)	4/25/2002 4:28:12 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 68005

Jim: Whats amazing is the bullish percent levels, still relatively high. Last I checked (tuesday) they were still at levels indicating a peak so there quite some room to go on these (although from what I've read we are @ or near a bounce point).

To: j g cordes who wrote (36840)	4/25/2002 5:47:58 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 68005

Jim: A NAZ 50 point chart. Notice we just put in a new O and are just above the April 2000 support. We break this then the 50 pt indicates the next support is the September spike low. stockcharts.com The 25 point chart shows support @ 1,650 and 1,550 stockcharts.com Maybe by then the sentiment indicators start to line up. The S&P 500. Not to worry Abbey is bullish. After all pro froma earnings should be fine this year. stockcharts.com I liked reading how TYC came up with pro forma cash flow of $1 billion yet GAAP basis is less than $100M and I didn’t see a balance sheet. Maybe I missed the balance sheet in the business wire release but of course who was the last company not releasing a balance sheet. The NYSE BP – well it hasn’t reversed yet. Maybe the data feed is wrong. stockcharts.com The COMP BP stockcharts.com The telecom sector. I can’t understand how its in bull alert. stockcharts.com The thing is if you pull charts up of GE (industrial & finance), IBM (tech), PFE (drug) to name 3. It doesn’t bode well for the overall market. Ok enough of being grim. Go pull up a gold chart. Tim

To: j g cordes who wrote (36840)	5/4/2002 8:28:03 PM
From: Johnny Canuck	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 68005

OT Hi Jim, I am not sure how good the image capture side of digital photography is going, but I am impressive with the output side. I am in the process of ordering a print for my collection and the photographer offered to do a large format test C-print. He had a production house do a print using a Laserfire technique that I could not distinguish from a negative produced print. The clarify seems a lot better too. The image did not start to distort and soften as when you do large format (20 X 24 or larger) prints. I was quite impressed. He did a color and a black and white print and even the black and white looks cripsy. You usually see more imperfections in the black and white image, but it look very clear to me. It turned out so well that I decide not to have the negative print done. The original image was on slide film and the creation of negative was going to require that the slide by photographed. That would have create another level of distortion. It did not seem worth the effort. It is truly quite impressive what they can do on the output side.