SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Middle East Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: High-Tech East who wrote (1573)4/25/2002 6:24:51 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6945
 
One way for the Palestinians to have avoided this catastrophe would have been to not send 23 people into Israel to blow up crowded buses and restaurants in the last 18 months.

It wasn't 23 people, it was hundreds. Most were stopped before the boom, or under conditions where the bomber killed only himself. Only the "successes" made the US papers. To date there have been nearly one hundred "successes", ie suicide bombings where the bomber took Jews with him. Not to mention the mass shootings of bus stops, the infiltrations of settlements, the roadside bombings, the gunfights at checkpoints, etc, etc. This "intifada" (the word means 'uprising') is not really a popular uprising, but has been a military operation almost from the start.



To: High-Tech East who wrote (1573)4/25/2002 7:22:18 PM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 6945
 
Well said. The only thing missing is the crucial fact that it wasn't just the "provocation" by Sharon and his 1000 troops that kicked off the Intifada, nor was it Israel's refusal to vacate those settlements at Camp David. It was Israeli snipers firing on a Palestinian crowd of demonstrators, killing a number of unarmed civilian demonstrators, which began the cycle of violence.

Tom