Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (10765)	4/25/2002 4:20:33 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

As a court has ruled on it, it is a legal issue......

To: Lane3 who wrote (10765)	4/25/2002 4:30:09 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

By the way, the voters of Oregon do not have the right to re- institute slavery, under the Constitution, nor to allow polluters to ignore the Clean Air Act. From a political perspective, there is reason to wonder if the issue of assisted suicide ought to be debated nationally, rather than creating an open breach in the current ethical norms under which physicians operate in one state only to see what consequences it has over time throughout the country. Finally, there is plenty of reason, besides fundamentalism, to think that assisted suicide should not be legal, even if it is treated leniently. Therefore, I have no ready response to Ashcroft's position, and would be curious to know if he acted with due discretion in choosing his legal basis......