Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: XenaLives who wrote (56681)	4/25/2002 4:27:06 PM
From: XenaLives	Respond to of 99280

Afterthought - they may even be loosing control of the church grin.

To: XenaLives who wrote (56681)	4/25/2002 4:30:35 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

<If the index rallies from here, wouldn't that be a pretty bullish sign?> the three knock rule will go into effect. If it rallies here but then comes back for a third knock, that would be a very bearish sign.

To: XenaLives who wrote (56681)	4/25/2002 4:31:06 PM
From: Ron Dior	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

Switch that chart to weekly - was Sept actually a double bottom, just exacerbated because of 9/11? Ah... So if we can just change the starting point of our crusade we can make a case both bullish or bearish. Kind of makes T/A seem a like a bit of a farce..... If we could move the chart ahead by 2 years would we still see a double bottom or would we see something totally different. And I thought this was an accurate science. This just proves my point that most T/A has more holes in it than the "theory of evolution". Ron Dior