SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (27014)4/25/2002 10:10:47 PM
From: tekboy  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 281500
 
1. There's a lot of stuff in there that's horrible, that should not have happened, and that makes me, as as Jew and a supporter of Israel, feel ashamed.

2. At the same time, however, the tone of the report and the language used strikes me as significantly out of line with the facts it presents, and deeply biased against Israel. Far from describing gross wanton atrocities, the data recounted there seem to indicate a tough military operation carried out against armed enemy fighters that also caused significant damage and suffering to people and places in the fighters' immediate vicinity. The one time the troops are presented as learning that civilians alone were present, they are described as having turned away. As the subtitle perhaps unconsciously implies, the authors, I believe, were hoping to find atrocities, and presented what they could muster up to fit their preconceived story line. I would be ashamed to run such a piece of journalism in any publication I was associated with.

tb@justMHO.com