Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Technology Gone Too Far -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (167)	4/25/2002 9:14:54 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 190

Thanks Bob. Fantastic time; Badri says hello. Times are tough over there now. There were trekkers on the trail of course, but about half the number of '01 or '00. In some villages(Langtang and Kyangin Gompa), they actually have a rotating schedule where only 3 teahouses were permitted to operate each day. So on any given day there were several teahouses left totally empty. Hopefully tourism will get a bump up soon and peace will return. Kind of a sad irony that one of the Maoist strongholds within Nepal is Kapilavastu, the dtistrict which is home to Lumbini, the Birthplace of Buddha. I met many volunteers on the trail; if my AMAT does well later this year, I think I may find myself over there as I am not too enamoured with my current job(that is a gross understatement BTW). Regards, Brian

To: FJB who wrote (167)	6/18/2002 2:58:47 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 190

U.N. says "digital divide still yawns" By Reuters June 18, 2002, 10:45 AM PT news.com.com The digital divide between rich and poor countries is growing, despite the many efforts to help developing nations break into the global economy via computers, according to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan. "The digital divide still yawns as widely as ever, with billions of people still unconnected to a global society which...is more and more wired," Annan said. "Despite commendable efforts and various initiatives, we are still very far from ensuring that the benefits of information and communications technology are available to all," he said Monday at the start of a two-day session of the U.N. General Assembly devoted to computers and development. Annan called on the industry to work with governments, civic groups and the United Nations to find better ways to integrate developing nations into globalization, and to be prepared to commit resources to the problem over the long term. Participants said there was broad consensus that information and communications technologies could play a major role in promoting economic growth and development, and fighting poverty and disease. But progress has been slow in many parts of the world. "Some countries have prospered while others have fallen behind," said Yoshio Utsumi, secretary-general of the Geneva-based International Telecommunications Union. "If we do not take any action, the gap between the information 'haves' and 'have-nots' will continue to grow." Utsumi said "information poverty" remained a reality for much of the world. More than 80 countries had fewer than 10 telephone lines for every 100 inhabitants. And in three out of five countries, fewer than one out of 100 people used the Internet, he said. "Information has become the key to competitive advantage for both business and modern states," he said. "Anyone can work and provide a product to the global market, even from a remote corner of the world, if the means of communication are readily and cheaply available." Story Copyright © 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

To: FJB who wrote (167)	7/3/2002 2:28:17 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 190

Closer Look: How technology can endanger our freedom By Jack Robertson EBN (07/02/02 14:22 p.m. EST) Eleven score and six years ago our forefathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation conceived in liberty -- but they certainly could not ever imagine the technological threats that one day could imperil the freedoms they so cherished. This July 4 as we celebrate the nation's birth, we who are heirs to this heritage of freedom may also not imagine the new threats any more than the founders. Ubiquitous electronic surveillance of air waves by the National Security Agency and other agencies puts private conversations at risk of federal eavesdropping. We are assured that the Feds are only looking for terrorists, spies and other nefarious subjects. We accept the assurances because we want adequateintelligence to unmask terrorists' plots. And because we trust that the infinite mass of electronic snooping has great trouble ferreting out the target suspects, let alone John Q. and Susie Public. The FBI last year ran into political heat for a previously secret program to monitor e-mail traffic without a court order. Authorities said the project has been canceled. But the capability always lurks in the background. The terrorist threat has generated its own potential attacks on personal liberty. Take the simple proposal of Trusted Air Passenger Check-in. Frequent travelers would be pre-screened and approved for speedy airport security check-in. Each cleared traveler would get a biometric authentication card -- either fingerprint, handprint or iris verification. But the government data base of personal information gained for pre-clearance is subject to abuse. And each airport check-in could provide a convenient automated government log of personal travel. Proposals for a national biometric ID card for citizens and legal immigrants would expand this government monitoring to wider dimensions of potential surveillance. The increasing use of camera surveillance of vast areas of public life opens new civil liberty questions. With face matching recognition technology, authorities can fairly readily track any targeted person, nefarious or otherwise. We tolerate such surveillance bordering on Orwell's 1984 Big Brother as a safeguard for security. It is a disturbing question on what happens in one of the next waves of political hysteria -- McCarthyism, unpopular mass protests, new dirty tricks and enemies lists -- that periodically engulf the country. The amazing part is how easy we make it for government snoopers to pry into our private lives, without resorting to elaborate intelligence schemes. If commercial marketers can accumulate a dossier on our behavior simply by monitoring our e-mail purchases, or even web browsing, the government can certainly do as well, or more. Frankly, I don't like the invasion of privacy from browser cookies for business purposes, and fear government intrusion even more. A few technocrats have questioned if Microsoft Corp.'s secure Passport option can be breached, particularly if users don't follow procedures to the letter every time. Passport stores the user password and financial data on the server site for ease of tranactions with a vast array of businesses. Microsoft's upcoming encrypted Palladium e-mail software program has also raised some eyebrows. Microsoft firmly assures that neither security option can be compromised. In the wake of 9/11, it would seem that July 4 might not be the best time to raise surveillance concerns. Hung in the dilemma of protecting the homeland and still maintaining the freedoms we celebrate, we have no easy answers.