Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (10850)	4/25/2002 9:17:12 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

You may do as you wish. And, yes, a request by one party is binding. The simplest thing may be simply to put Jewel on ignore.

To: epicure who wrote (10850)	4/25/2002 9:28:10 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

es stupido This is an interesting scenario--from a strictly academic perspective, of course. I could ask, say, Solon and Tim and Charley not to post to me. As a result, they could not post either to or about me and I could not post to or about them, as well. I wouldn't want to do that, of course. It's easier on me and less risky, too, to just put them on ignore. Not that I'd want to do that, either. When we apply rules in actual practice, we get some odd results. I assumed Cosmic had just been busy...