SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (146427)4/25/2002 9:57:37 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572455
 
Ted,

Re: "......insatiable means never satisfied, and not.....using all the resources."

Obviously you haven't "thought through" the use of this word. Don't
you see the contradiction in your statement -->

Insatiable means never satisfied (I agree), however the USA doesn't
use all the world's supply of oil, thus the USA has a limited need for oil and is thus satiated.

Re: "I think we need to reduce our dependency on oil. Do you disagree?"

I don't disagree IF the oil is replaced by another energy source.
BTW, are you also against nuclear power ... That "liberal dogma thingy" again.
What would you propose to replace oil ??!!

Re: "It should have no effect if done correctly."

Please "share" your plan for this ... How long would this take ?? How
much more in expense relative to oil ??

Make It So,
Yousef



To: tejek who wrote (146427)4/25/2002 10:01:38 PM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 1572455
 
Ted,

Re: "I think we need to reduce our dependency on oil ..."

You didn't answer my question -->

Do you believe the USA should use the same resources (or oil)
(per capita) as the rest of the world ??

Make It So,
Yousef


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News