SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeuspaul who wrote (27098)4/26/2002 9:11:03 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 281500
 
The press was denied access.

I've been denied access (because I haven't asked ;0) and have only seen pictures taken from passing aircraft...

But I can clearly see the severest damage was localized at the area where the Israelis stated they had engaged the terrorist fighters.. maybe 5-10% of the total urban area.

And if there is "bias", why should the Israelis provide them potential "ammunition" to promote that bias? Not granting them access makes their reports "speculation" with little documentation.. And most of their information comes from Palestinian "stringers" who are likely to be the most biased of all.

As for war crimes, in my opinion all war is a crime... But there's no objective legal authority who can TRULY adjudicate them since every nation has been guilty of them...

Obviously it wasn't a war crime for the US to bomb and blast towns and villages in most of its wars, where suspected enemy troops were located (without giving advance notice either).. And war crimes commissions are usually held by the victors, not the vanquished.

So let's not delude ourselves into believing war is civilized, or can be governed by the rules of civilized behavior, at an individual level. I reserve war crimes violations for institutionalized violations against humanity, such as genocide (who's been indicted and convicted in Ruwanda?) where it's pretty clear there was intentional and systematic violations of human rights..

But then we fall back to that most basic premise being that human rights might be inalienable in the eyes of god, but in the eyes they are perishable if they cannot be defended.. And defended through a process called war, which generally involves massive violations of the other sides human rights.

Hawk