Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (14114)	4/26/2002 12:17:52 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

I believe we are capable of doing it with air and naval forces. The same way we took out the afghan al Quada. Depending on the the correct use of guided missles and intellegent strikes, we could take them out with little to no opposition. Then go forward into Iraq and Iran. I do know (from Janes Fighting forces) that we have the capabilities to do it with limited nuclear weapons. Reasons to do it now instead of later would be.... 1. To difuse the sitsuation before more sides are taken. 2. Attitude adjustment to all these countries that we have supported with aid.{That have now biten the hand that feeds them} 3. Disolving of the U.N to make them a non group, and 4. ridding this idea of a one world government, world court garbage. JMHO.