Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (146490)	4/26/2002 1:26:53 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579680

Ted, SGMA's on a roll! No News. Over 4000 shares traded! Heavy Volume! Somebody must know something!! Buy Buy Buy!!! LOL!! tgptndr

To: tejek who wrote (146490)	4/26/2002 1:35:23 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579680

Were 1-2 years accurate which it is not, you would still not have oil asap.......the need is now, not two or 3 years from now. Your statement is half right. The need is now, but the need also will exist in 3 years -- in all likelihood the need will be much greater in 3 years. After 7, maybe 10 years, I expect the need will be reduced. But in the meantime, we have the oil, the footprint would be 1/10000 of the area in ANWR, and it makes no sense whatsoever for us not to be developing it. Again not that it matters, the squeeze for oil is now, not 3 years from now. Again, there is every reason to anticipate that the squeeze will be worse three years from now than it is today. I think you're overly balled up about this Saudi thing, though. The Saudis will come around when we need for them to. They won't have any trouble remembering who protects them from Saddam, & they're not fools. Of course, it would be great for Saddam to make one of his typical miscalculations and move against the Saudis right about now. I think that would reinforce for them who needs whom.