SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (164626)4/26/2002 2:16:36 PM
From: Robert Douglas  Respond to of 186894
 
The reason I posted it is because it (GDP growth) was a surprise to me. I thought it was still in 0 to 2% range.

Although not as bad as you were expecting, the economic growth reported in this morning's numbers isn't nearly as strong as it appears. Inventories were liquidated at only a $34 billion rate in Q1 compared to $114 billion rate in Q4. This adds $80 billion to the rate of change. Considering that final sales of domestic product only rose $88 billion, you can see how the lessening of inventory liquidation added to growth in the quarter.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (164626)4/28/2002 3:42:13 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 186894
 
"I don't know. But the percentage represents not the amount, but a percentage. On average, I guess both benefited from the growth, small and large. The reason I posted it is because it (GDP growth) was a surprise to me."

I guess it is not necessary to remind about the concept
of percentage. The reason I asked was that I think it
is important to know to what extent the factual GDP depends
on stock market insanity. If the publicly-traded companies
contribute 80-90% to GDP, I would worry very much.
If the number is 10-20%, it is just a nice gambling,
and nothing to worry about. Of course, it is not that
simple since all businesses are interconnected, but
anyway... It is strange I could not find a person who
knows the answer.

- Ali