Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rich4eagle who wrote (251414)	4/26/2002 4:48:43 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Democratic societys that embrace freedom win out with me EVERY TIME(me too)" Then why do you think Israel and the Palestinians are equaly at fault? One is a civilize democracy, and one is run by a religious fanatic that supports (heavily) suicide bombers. The rest of your post is the type of gibberish that I was trying to avoid, but you apparantly are not interested. I make those harsh statement because that is what I believe your postions to be (just as I stated) based on your posts. There also are a lot of insults and anymosity coming my way that you conveniently leave out of your post. Can't even count how many times you have called me dumb. Do you truly believe that I am dumb, or is that a lie? Some reasons for my observations: "You hate America(A DISGUSTING LIE) You portray our President, who is a patriotic American imo as a coward and a liar with no evidence. You seem to have contempt for honest tax payers who support our way of life, and you defend the actions of entities that I view as our enemies way too often for my taste. I should have said you SEEM to hate America, because to me, it looks like you do. I am glad that you don't, and was trying to steer our future exchanges in a more civil direction. "for defending what is right(A LIE)" You specifically insuted me for only supporting what is right. I did not (and do not) know how to interpret that any differently. "but support (at least partially) the killing of innocents by religious fanatics that are fueled by government inspired hatred (A TOTAL LIE)." This stems from your viewing Sharon and Arafat as equals, and your seeming belief that both countries (or entities) are at fault. I will go back to my position that the U.N. divided the land into halves for Israel and Palestine. Israel accepted, and Palestine did not. I beleieve (but am open to change if someone can show me I am wrong) that Palestians left their area so others could wipe out Israel and take it all for themselves (or for other Arab nations). Again, please correct this view if it is wrong. Otherwise I will ASSUME that it does not matter to you who is right and wrong, as evidenced by the exchange referenced above about me being only concerned about "right". You also have supported in some cases a person who clearly looks like an anti-jewish and very prejudiced person (Emile), which taints my view of you (sorry, but it does). Emile's reason for the Palestinians rejecting their half was that Israel declared independence, which to me does not seem like a reasonable reason. IF it is reasonable, why? Calling the leader of Israel a murderer does not give me the view that you are unbiased either. "Again, with your professed hatred of religion (ANOTHER HUGE LIE), it surprises me that you view these systems as equal(another lie)" See above. Now again, if you would like to start off on another foot, maybe we can have some decent conversations. I told you that I would be civil if you will. But I will stick to my honest position that I post about what I percieve your view to be. If I was lying (which you say that I am), that would mean that I am MAKING UP my feelings on your positions to purposely mislead. I am not, have not, and will not do that. Care to start over, or do you want more of the same?