Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2938)	4/26/2002 6:29:31 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95487

Don, [edited] Tuesday! No encouragement from Zeev Message 17390919 G.

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2938)	4/27/2002 8:39:29 PM
From: cordob	Respond to of 95487

Negativism ruled the day then, just as it ruled the market this week. Are we at the magic "turn around" day? I wish I knew!<gg> The posts on the SI boards are very negative these days - that is typically a good sign for a reversal pattern in the near future. Don, absolutely as a contrarian and an anticyclical investor, I think it is great when all the kitchen help cries "we are going in the toilet", that is usually exactly the point where smart people are buyign at depressed levels and hold until everybody says it is going to the moon. Also I think it is not too smart to try to pick the bottom, if you feel you know which is a good stock, buy it now (use no margin) and go on holiday. Cheers Cor

To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (2938)	4/28/2002 5:34:13 AM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95487

Don, more gloom from Barron's... April 29th, 2002 Intel Confab Bodes Ill for Chip Stocks By ERIC J. SAVITZ excerpt >Intel provided a sobering tidbit about the semiconductor equipment sector. Dan Niles, Lehman's chip analyst, noted that one slide presented by CFO Andy Bryant indicated that Intel's capital spending in 2003 as a percentage of costs of good sold would dip a bit from 2002. Most analysts, Niles says, have been forecasting Intel's total cost of goods sold in 2003 would rise about 10%, which suggests capital spending for next year would be up less than 10% from the $5.5 billion budgeted for 2003. (Intel so far hasn't otherwise commented on 2003 capital spending plans.) A rise of less than 10% would seem fairly disappointing giving the high hopes for a robust recovery: SEMI, the equipment industry trade group, has been forecasting a 29% sales increase for next year. Given the healthy performance of the equipment stocks this year, any moderation of expectations of the coming recovery wouldn't be good news for the sector. Niles, who has been advising Intel investors to "sell on strength," also sees danger ahead for many mainstream chip stocks. In recent months, he maintains, chip makers have benefited from overly zealous inventory cutting done by personal computer makers in late 2001. The result has been a need for the box makers to replenish inventory. But Niles contends that inventories are nearly back to normal, which suggests that sales growth in the second half of the year will require improving demand from tech and telecom end markets. Expectations are high that Intel and other chip makers will show a smart recovery in the year's last six months. But, so far, no signs of an impending pickup have materialized. And, Niles notes, valuations are rich.< subscribers online.wsj.com Gottfried