SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paul_philp who wrote (51150)4/28/2002 1:51:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 54805
 
Blades Will Be Sharp When Buyers Start Buying Again

By BILL ALPERT
From Barron's
April 29th, 2002

If anyone were buying servers, they'd want blade servers. Along with a Hollywood-sexy name, blade servers offer to slice the expense of running data centers, where big enterprises do their critical computing on racks of powerful computers known as servers. Blade servers reduce power bills, eliminate thickets of cable and save personnel costs.

The blade architecture disaggregates the pieces found inside a traditional server, says Colin Fowles, director of the blades business team at Sun Microsystems. Each blade card has a processor chip, DRAM memory chips and a hard disk drive, but other components, such as power supplies and cooling fans, are shared among server blades. The blades plug into a network backbone that runs up the rack. Network routers, switches and storage devices will also assume upright positions as blades, instead of the horizontal rack form they now assume.

The whole computer industry seems to be honing blade products. Firms such as Intel and BroadCom have chips. Pioneering blade server systems have been fielded by startups such as Cubix, Edgenera, LinuxNetworx and RLX Technologies. But the big computer firms are drawing their blades this year, including Compaq Computer, Dell Computer, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Sun.

Compaq leads the biggies, having introduced its ProLiant BL server in January. Mary T. McDowell, the senior vice president who runs Compaq's Industry Standard Server Group (and who's tapped to run that server group in the post-merger H-P), says Compaq has shipped more than 3,000 processor blades to date. Like Gillette, Compaq will sell you a ten-pack of blades -- for $17,091. In a rack space that held 42 traditional servers, the ProLiant BL crams 280 server blades. The system can run a mix of system software, with some blades running Microsoft Windows 2000 and others running Linux software from vendors such as Red Hat Software and SuSe.

Each Compaq blade has an Intel Pentium III chip that runs at low voltage to keep the densely-packed rack from overheating. By quarter's end, says McDowell, Compaq will be shipping blades with two processors per unit, going to four processors by year end. Intel is eager to supply server chips. At its analyst meeting Thursday, the company argued that its Itanium chips performed 30% to 48% better than Sun's SPARC processors, at as little as 20% of the cost.

Unhappy Returns: The Nasdaq Composite lost 2.9% on Friday and 7.4% on the week, to close at 1663.89. Intel failed to impress analysts at an annual gathering. Amazon.com's good quarter stood out among the week's many disappointing reports.

Sun will ship its blade products in the second half of this year, says blade boss Fowles. Like Compaq's, the Sun product will allow a software mix -- but in Sun's case, the mix will be Sun's Unix software running on its SPARC processors, or Linux running on Intel-compatible processors. Unlike Compaq, however, Sun plans to open its design to third-party firms that want to offer add-on blades specialized for network security or multimedia.

These early blade servers are best suited for simple computing jobs, like hosting Web pages. When manufacturers deliver multiprocessor blades, and faster internal networks, blade servers will take on heavier tasks such as running e-mail servers and Oracle databases.

While Compaq is clearly moving product, Sun blade man Fowles thinks that many customers will take 2002 to study the new offerings of H-P, IBM and Sun. Next year, he hopes blades will start flashing and eventually gain as much as a third of the server market.



To: paul_philp who wrote (51150)4/29/2002 7:52:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
The Future Face of Enterprise Computing

By Lisa Gill
www.NewsFactor.com
Mon Apr 29, 1:40 PM ET

While analysts are reluctant to peer more than five years into the future of IT, they agree that the near future holds the promise of a better, faster and more value-packed enterprise computing environment -- albeit one with heightened security concerns.

At least, that will be the case once chief information officers (CIOs) are able to start planning for the future again, following the crunch of time, energy and resources that plagued IT in 2001 and early 2002.

IT Appetite Satiated - For Now

Forrester (Nasdaq: FORR - news) group director Ted Schadler told NewsFactor that the corporate appetite for new technology is at a near-record low right now. Enterprises instead have focused on getting increased value from applications purchased last year, he said.

According to Schadler, a Forrester survey of 1,000 IT and business managers in North America showed that spending in all areas of IT -- except integration and storage -- had declined over the last year.

Spending on CRM, desktop upgrades, ERP, business services, consultants and e-commerce, Schadler noted, all decreased from the previous year.

"This is sort of like the inventory problem in manufacturing," he said. "Once the inventory is used up, the appetite will come back. It's a 2002 phenomenon, and as to when it's going to break, we think the 'up' pattern starts in 2003."

Web Services Defined

Despite the slowdown in IT spending, Web services implementation topped every analyst's list of future investments.

The term "Web services" is often defined as technology that connects businesses and business partners' computers and networks over the Internet, using tools like Microsoft's .NET and Sun Microsystems' Java. But according to Schadler, Web services is a technology looking for a precise definition.

"The problem with Web services is that it's an elephant and you're a blind man. Some people see a wall, some people see a snake," he said.

Five-Year Horizon

Schadler pointed to Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT - news), Sun, IBM (NYSE: IBM - news) and Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL - news) as companies that currently are shipping Web services technologies. But because CIOs are grappling with the challenge of how to wring more value from existing applications, he does not expect to see much demand for new services until 2003.

John Gantz, chief research officer of IDC, told NewsFactor that he foresees a timeline of five years for full implementation of Web services.

"Most companies have thousands of computer applications, so it will be one at a time that they will migrate to Web services tools to integrate, upgrade or replace," Gantz said.

He likened the adoption of Web services to Java's implementation. Before that programming language became widely used, it took several years for companies to determine whether it was a profitable tool; for programmers to perfect their skills; and for applications to be developed.

Wireless Networks Adopted

Enterprise computing also will see the adoption of wireless networks on a larger scale, analysts noted, driven in particular by increased adoption of smaller computing devices, such as PDAs.

Neal Goldman, research director at the Yankee Group, told NewsFactor that he expects more people soon will use handheld devices with souped-up computing power.

"Now, you've got applications which are going to run on these devices that have reasonable computing power," Goldman said. "Web services is going to be the mechanism these things use to communicate with each other, and it all creates a big, huge security problem."

Adopting LANs

While analysts note that implementing wireless LANs is not on most companies' immediate agenda, they expect to see large-scale adoption of the technology in the near future as speed increases and costs drop.

IDC's Gantz said he believes the healthcare and banking industries are best positioned for wireless adoption. He added that 3G (third generation) mobile networking will fundamentally alter the way universities -- and even small towns -- connect to the Internet and to each other.

Gantz explained that with 3G networks, several LANs in one area could act as a single connection. "If you had your facilities organized right, you could almost have a 20-mile LAN using wireless and then have some really nice high speeds," he said.

Security Flaws in Focus

Goldman's comment about security concerns regarding Web services and wireless networks is a message repeated by many other analysts.

IDC senior security analyst Alan Carey told NewsFactor that he anticipates a greater focus on security at the application level as enterprise shifts its attention away from the network layer and the perimeter, particularly as Web services are adopted.

Carey also said he believes a change in programming strategies will occur as software developers focus more attention on security issues at the beginning stages of program creation, rather than at the end.

Not for Y2K Only

"I think Bill Gates (news - web sites) has addressed this and realizes that security is a top concern, and that some features and functionality may be sacrificed in order to develop more secure software," Carey said.

As for security's role in the enterprise and the increased focus on keeping enterprise systems safe from attack, Carey declared that security's high profile is here to stay.

"Security is not a Y2K event. It's not a onetime deal. As long as enterprises are communicating and conducting business over the Internet, security will have to remain a top concern," he noted.

Digital Media Use To Increase

The Yankee Group's Goldman anticipated that corporate communications also will change soon. He pointed to teleconferences, videoconferences, Web collaboration and streaming media as ways in which companies might routinely disseminate information in the future.

"[Those methods] can be an effective method of communicating to a lot of people very quickly. If you're sharing information between people, then it's a way to have audit trails of information and create a knowledge history that wouldn't exist otherwise," Goldman explained.

Goldman believes instant messaging (news - web sites) could impact corporate communications in a similar way to e-mail, though the instantaneous nature of it could prove aggravating.

"I think there are some cultural issues around that, like I don't want to be bugged everywhere I go -- kind of the same as with cell phones," said Goldman.

story.news.yahoo.com