Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (78524)	4/26/2002 11:42:38 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Pete, Did you look at the slides in the meeting presentation? Clawhammer SCSC gets 135% of the memory bandwidth of AXP at the same clock. Which slides? I am interested. Thus, since AXP gets 2.1GB/sec, Clawhammer gets 2.84GB/sec with PC2100 as base effective. Better way to say this would be that AXP never takes the full advantage of PC-2100, only 1/1.35 effective, while Clawhammer will be able to take close to the max. Clawhammer (suggested name Athlon XP64) will have enough effective BW to outrun NW. Yes, I know that Opteron (Hammer DCSC) trumps NW in spades even in 1 way workstations. You know that I would love to be wrong about this single vs. dual memory channel stuff. Joe