SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Gryba who wrote (78576)4/27/2002 6:56:29 PM
From: ptannerRespond to of 275872
 
C, re: "ETA 5/15 and it's more expensive than all the P4 solutions. What gives?"

(Not Dan <g>) The Athlon solution is $7 or 2% more than the P4 solution - the others were P3 or Celeron systems.

-PT



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (78576)4/27/2002 7:06:28 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"ETA 5/15 and it's more expensive than all the P4 solutions. What gives?"

Because it is more desirable?

The most likely reason is heat. Until AMD can actually ship the promised 130nm Tbred chips, Intel has the advantage here. For what it is worth, most of the people who are interested in those small systems want Athlons in my experience. The people that I know that have gone ahead an bought the Shuttle systems have wound up using VIA chips, and whined because they couldn't use an Athlon. No one seems interested in the P4 versions.



To: Charles Gryba who wrote (78576)4/27/2002 10:02:12 PM
From: Dan3Respond to of 275872
 
Re: ETA 5/15 and it's more expensive than all the P4 solutions. What gives?

It's $360 instead of $353 (only a $7 difference) and the AMD system comes with a 200watt power supply instead of a 150 watt power supply. Looks like they want to be able to support Palomino with that platform, not just SFF Thoroughbred.

This isn't a Small Form Factor system, it's about twice as big as an SFF "book" computer.