Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edmond Katonica who wrote (95730)	4/29/2002 9:23:34 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Edmond, But the NAV return, what the fund actually made, not what the market was willing to pay for it, was much different. quicktake.morningstar.com BTW, the 1999 number for market return was not 8.9%, it was -18.9%, according to Morningstar. The fund return, NAV, actually did better than that, so the discontinuity can work against you sometimes. The big problems I see are the big up numbers for market return vs. actual fund returns in 2000, 2001, and 2002. As I said, the market return is totally discount turning to premium. I am sure an argument can be made that the premium will go higher, but I think that is the argument you must make to buy the fund. Again, good luck with it.