Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (11280)	4/29/2002 12:47:32 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"So, to further any discussion we should move past this position to one that considers a God who is truly Omnipotent, non-dependant, non-anthropomorphic, beyond materialistic descriptors, eternal, and infinite." As I said, why do you wish to discuss a God who has no interest in you--especially when He is outside of material descriptors and comprehension. You have already said everything you could possibly imagine about Him in a single sentence: a God incapable of caring, unable to love. A God separated and locked away from human beings by their insistence that He be Perfect and free of desires and emotional and intellectual longings. "Me...seeking truth. You, <<insert reason>>." The question ("why are we talking about him") was rhetorical, JOTW. There was no need to answer.